{ "personId": "confucius", "uid": "SL-0051", "name": "孔子", "version": "V2研究贡献账", "updatedAt": "2026-09-15", "formula": { "q": "Q = 10^(M/2) − 1", "light": "Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ", "total": "L = Σ Lᵢ", "score": "S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L)" }, "scopeNote": "本轮当前已列2项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。", "exclusions": [ { "id": "CONFUCIUS-ANALECTS-AUTHORSHIP", "title": "《论语》各章的确定作者与成书层次", "reason": "弟子编纂是传统叙述，但章节、材料和权威性存在争议；出土材料也显示更广泛的语录流通，故不将全部文本逐句直接归于孔子。", "sources": [ { "label": "斯坦福哲学百科：孔子", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/" }, { "label": "Early China：论语形成的新出土材料研究", "url": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/early-china/article/new-manuscript-evidence-on-the-formation-of-the-analects-the-warring-states-anhui-university-zhongni-said-and-the-wangjiazui-kongzi-said/08F1860CBCFD361F58B2034439A71526" } ] }, { "id": "CONFUCIUS-LATER-INSTITUTIONS", "title": "后世儒家制度与国家治理结果", "reason": "科举、书院、官僚教育和国家制度由后世儒者与政权主体分别建构，不从思想源头直接回投为孔子个人成果。" } ], "items": [ { "id": "OUT-SL0051-RITUAL-VIRTUE-CULTIVATION-ETHICS", "title": "礼乐修养与关系性德性伦理", "summary": "传统上归于孔子的礼乐修养、仁与关系性德性思想，把情感训练、社会角色和人格养成相连。相关表述依托既有周礼传统，并经弟子、早期文本编辑和教学共同体传承。", "M": "7.0", "budget": [ { "actor": "孔子", "actorId": "SL-0051", "type": "PERSON_TRADITIONAL_CORE", "share": "0.50" }, { "actor": "周代礼乐与既有德性理想的具体前史", "actorId": "CONFUCIUS::ZHOU-RITUAL-MUSIC-AND-ETHICAL-PREHISTORY", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.20" }, { "actor": "弟子、早期文本层及其他未解析的实质形成动作", "actorId": "CONFUCIUS::UNRESOLVED-REMAINDER-FORMATION-ACTIONS", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.30" } ], "mReason": "保留M7.0：限定对象把礼、仁、角色关系、情感训练与德性治理应用组织成跨生活领域的伦理框架；已有跨代批判、教学和实践使用支持原框架持续作用。M不领取孟子、宋明理学、科举或国家制度的新作用，也不按年代和名望加成。现有材料不足以证明改变文明基本能力总体边界，故不取M8。", "aReason": "研究点估：完整终态同时包含周礼与既有德性理想的具体输入，以及把礼乐转化为情感调节、角色伦理和人格养成框架的核心重构。SEP既指出传统材料和文本层归属不确定，也明确把礼乐理由的伦理心理转向识别为孔子可辨认的创新。旧0.38让没有独立动作清单的0.40未解析池成为最大形成者，依据不足；本轮以孔子传统核心0.50、具体前史0.20、未解析实质形成0.30作为可修订中心点。", "overlapNote": "教学操作另列；孟子新增伦理心理论证另列。孔子不再在孟子项以个人前驱份额重复领取同一原框架作用。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "仍需逐章核等级、性别与服从规范的不可分净影响，并区分孔子、弟子和早期文本层的具体命题；这些缺口进入未解析责任，不改变本轮中心M。原本无法证明互斥的形成池已合并为剩余未解析责任，不声称已证实这些份额归其他人。具体命题归属未闭合；当前孔子0.50、具体前史0.20、未解析0.30均为可修订研究点估，不是史料测量。《论语》及相关早期材料多源且后成，孔子、弟子与文本层的逐命题责任未闭合；但未知不能等同于已证他人贡献。若发现可定位的概念关系或论证新增，未解析池可动作化；若只发现保存、编排或措辞整理，余池应回缩而非继续扣住孔子。", "sources": [ { "label": "斯坦福哲学百科：孔子", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/" }, { "label": "Early China：论语形成的新出土材料研究", "url": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/early-china/article/new-manuscript-evidence-on-the-formation-of-the-analects-the-warring-states-anhui-university-zhongni-said-and-the-wangjiazui-kongzi-said/08F1860CBCFD361F58B2034439A71526" } ], "year": "-500", "share": "0.50", "exactLight": "1580.638830084189665999446772216359266859777569662608413428752426396297219319619110672124054189650148", "light": "1580.638830", "standaloneScore": "6.40", "lightSharePercent": "87.5350", "changeReason": "在上一轮已采用的M与成果范围上重新判断形成责任；点估不是来源测量。详见 attribution-pair/DECISION.md。" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0051-POLITICAL-EDUCATIONAL-ETHICS", "title": "提示类推与因材回应的教学方法", "summary": "《论语》保存的教学案例通过有限提示鼓励类推，并根据学习者的不同倾向调整回答。这里合计这些教学操作，不重复计入礼德伦理内容。", "M": "5.4", "budget": [ { "actor": "孔子", "actorId": "SL-0051", "type": "PERSON_TRADITIONAL_CORE", "share": "0.45" }, { "actor": "参与方法设计或修订的弟子", "actorId": "CONFUCIUS::DISCIPLE-METHOD-CO-DESIGNERS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.14" }, { "actor": "口传、经典学习、提问与类推教学前史", "actorId": "CONFUCIUS::ORAL-LEARNING-CLASSIC-TEACHING-QUESTION-AND-ANALOGY-PREHISTORY", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.16" }, { "actor": "促成方法修订的学习者反馈", "actorId": "CONFUCIUS::LEARNER-FEEDBACK-METHOD-COFORMATION", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "把操作组织成可复用方法的早期文本形成者", "actorId": "CONFUCIUS::EARLY-SUBSTANTIVE-PEDAGOGY-TEXT-FORMATION", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "未解析的方法形成动作", "actorId": "CONFUCIUS::UNRESOLVED-PEDAGOGY-FORMATION-ACTIONS", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.15" } ], "mReason": "保留M5.4：成果只包含思学互补、有限提示后类推和依学习者差异回应的可复用操作，不是整个东亚教育系统。原典能辨认方法组，跨主题和长期可用性支持略高于M5；尚无足够独立效果证据取M6。", "aReason": "孔子作为提出、实施和修订这些操作的传统核心取.45。学生出现或课堂发生本身不分发明责任；只有促成方法形成的反馈、共同设计或实质文本组织才进入，且弟子、学习者和编辑按动作互斥。纯记录与传播退出，.15保留未解析。", "overlapNote": "只计2.15、7.8、11.22所限定的学习与教学操作；礼德伦理内容、后世学校制度及组合课堂干预效果排除。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "传世文本不证明逐字发言；缺逐场景复用与独立净效果证据，也缺弟子互动和早期文本形成的细分史。", "sources": [ { "label": "《论语》教学译本（Robert Eno，2015）", "url": "https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/items/12df6d92-4ac2-47d4-8c20-2f8018f2555d" } ], "year": "公元前5—4世纪传世材料", "share": "0.45", "exactLight": "225.0842551322725282506993840982255956272123954247686687683638551500550650599738100318967427966639317", "light": "225.084255", "standaloneScore": "4.71", "lightSharePercent": "12.4650", "changeReason": "M沿用5.4；预算已按aReason修订。精确个人份额由共同budget按actorId读取，单项分由公式生成。" } ], "exactTotalLight": "1805.723085216462194250146156314584862486989965087377082197116281546352284379592920704020796986314080", "totalLight": "1805.723085", "exactScore": "6.513783187492374841280738268918368490413522497687220367483302336115745868547119200966470899850055080", "displayScore": "6.51", "provisionalCount": 2, "provenance": { "releaseId": "research-200-20260914", "baselineLedgerSha256": "8bdd406b3e20ae22357644499e622922c670ff11010df0478c70c23b38902108", "c24DeltaSha256": "b0b96144d1d3397e54a61c3d706ff2da5920fe7617e3bef50407149cb97d9d62", "generatorSha256": "25de659e9852503508e7c27d8a31773b8da5d6310531b1e3699d18cc94319929" }, "priorScopeNote": "3项已列贡献的研究估分，含3项暂估。账本覆盖有限的主要成果，尚未穷尽生涯。M与归功份额是可修订的评估判断；未覆盖经历和负面影响不按零处理。", "rank": 37 }