{ "personId": "montesquieu", "uid": "SL-0124", "name": "孟德斯鸠", "version": "V2研究贡献账", "updatedAt": "2026-09-15", "formula": { "q": "Q = 10^(M/2) − 1", "light": "Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ", "total": "L = Σ Lᵢ", "score": "S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L)" }, "scopeNote": "本轮当前已列3项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。", "exclusions": [ { "id": "MONTESQUIEU-JUDICIAL-ACADEMIC-SERVICE", "title": "司法与学会任职的具体成果", "reason": "实际接触诉讼、监狱、刑罚管理并发表学会论文，但缺具体案件、改革、教学或科学方法终态；职位本身不创造M。", "sources": [ { "label": "斯坦福哲学百科", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/montesquieu/" }, { "label": "弗尔杰莎士比亚图书馆", "url": "https://catalog.folger.edu/record/781152" } ] } ], "items": [ { "id": "OUT-SL0124-1748-LAWS-INSTITUTIONS-COMPARATIVE-METHOD", "title": "法律、制度与环境关系的多因素比较方法", "year": "1748", "summary": "1748《论法的精神》把法律制度置于政体原则、自由、宗教、财富、商业、风俗、地理和气候关系中分析，并讨论权力互动制衡、司法独立和刑法限制。分权不简化为绝对隔离；现代宪政、社会科学和国家制度排除。", "mReason": "多因素制度分析和权力制衡构成跨政体复用的方法，文明尺度取M5.8。气候决定倾向、亚洲与性别等级概括，以及对奴隶制在某些条件下‘较可容忍’的论述，是框架内部不可分经验/规范缺陷，显著限制高档但不清零方法。", "aReason": "Montesquieu 0.38；法理与制度前史0.27；资料来源0.10；出版翻译0.12；实际观察论争网络0.05；未解析0.08。后继制宪者只作scope外采用，不因历史影响入预算。", "sources": [ { "label": "斯坦福哲学百科", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/montesquieu/" }, { "label": "斯坦福哲学百科", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/montesquieu/" }, { "label": "作品与历史研究资料", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi022" } ], "missing": "需原文区分环境描述、讽刺、经验断言和规范认可。；殖民、奴隶、亚洲和性别命题的卷次边界待核。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1748《论法的精神》把法律制度置于政体原则、自由、宗教、财富、商业、风俗、地理和气候关系中分析，并讨论权力互动制衡、司法独立和刑法限制。分权不简化为绝对隔离；现代宪政、社会科学和国家制度排除。", "M": "5.8", "budget": [ { "actor": "孟德斯鸠", "actorId": "SL-0124", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.38" }, { "actor": "自然法、政体理论与英国制度前史", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::NATURAL-LAW-REGIME-THEORY-AND-ENGLISH-INSTITUTIONAL-PREHISTORY", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.27" }, { "actor": "法律、历史和商业资料提供者", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::LEGAL-HISTORICAL-AND-COMMERCIAL-SOURCE-PRODUCERS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.1" }, { "actor": "出版者、编辑、译者及早期阅读反馈", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::PUBLISHERS-EDITORS-TRANSLATORS-AND-EARLY-READERS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.12" }, { "actor": "制度观察与争论参与者", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::INSTITUTIONAL-OBSERVATION-AND-DEBATE-NETWORK", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "尚未解析的贡献", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::UNRESOLVED-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.08" } ], "share": "0.38", "exactLight": "301.4647291952269707850489474778274143838050400670840461950830931404431649327652642488961957019323057", "light": "301.464729", "standaloneScore": "4.96", "lightSharePercent": "65.9737" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0124-1721-PERSIAN-LETTERS-CRITICAL-PERSPECTIVE", "title": "异域书信视角的文学—政治批判方法", "year": "1721", "summary": "1721《波斯人信札》用Usbek、Rica等虚构来信使欧洲习俗、宗教、权威和法律接受陌生目光审视。只计文学装置和政治社会批判；人物言论不直接等于作者立场，后世启蒙文学和宽容政策排除。", "mReason": "该文本把视角转换变成可复用的社会批判方法，兼有文学交付和政治反思，取M4.6。异域角色刻板化及家庭专制叙述的复杂规范张力进入边界；未校法文初版只影响置信度。", "aReason": "Montesquieu 0.45；文类前史0.23；匿名出版链0.10；翻译编辑读者0.12；未解析0.10。无直接传递的后继作家不入预算。", "sources": [ { "label": "斯坦福哲学百科", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/montesquieu/" }, { "label": "弗尔杰莎士比亚图书馆", "url": "https://catalog.folger.edu/record/781152" } ], "missing": "法文初版与版本差异、角色话语和作者立场边界待校准。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1721《波斯人信札》用Usbek、Rica等虚构来信使欧洲习俗、宗教、权威和法律接受陌生目光审视。只计文学装置和政治社会批判；人物言论不直接等于作者立场，后世启蒙文学和宽容政策排除。", "M": "4.6", "budget": [ { "actor": "孟德斯鸠", "actorId": "SL-0124", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.45" }, { "actor": "游记、书信体与异域观察文学前史", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::TRAVEL-NARRATIVE-EPISTOLARY-AND-FOREIGN-GAZE-PREHISTORY", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.23" }, { "actor": "匿名出版与早期编辑", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::ANONYMOUS-PUBLICATION-AND-EARLY-EDITORIAL-CHAIN", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.1" }, { "actor": "译者、编辑与文本读者", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::TRANSLATORS-EDITORS-AND-READERS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.12" }, { "actor": "尚未解析的文本归属", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::UNRESOLVED-TEXTUAL-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.1" } ], "share": "0.45", "exactLight": "89.33680417359958206086049285327910010938234419324057446534611501522189098141220340139210359088906582", "light": "89.336804", "standaloneScore": "3.91", "lightSharePercent": "19.5508" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0124-1734-ROMAN-COMPARATIVE-HISTORY", "title": "罗马制度兴衰的比较历史与反模仿分析", "year": "1734", "summary": "1734《罗马盛衰原因论》用罗马个案分析制度、权力与衰败，并反对把罗马直接当现代政府样板。只计比较历史方法试验，不领取罗马史全部解释或后世比较政治。", "mReason": "形成可复用的历史个案与制度比较方法，取M4.4。史料因果判断尚未逐章核定进入区间，不因资料形式降M。", "aReason": "Montesquieu 0.42；罗马史料与史学前史0.30；出版读者0.10；翻译编辑0.08；未解析0.10。", "sources": [ { "label": "斯坦福哲学百科", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/montesquieu/" } ], "missing": "史料选择和每项兴衰因果判断待核。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1734《罗马盛衰原因论》用罗马个案分析制度、权力与衰败，并反对把罗马直接当现代政府样板。只计比较历史方法试验，不领取罗马史全部解释或后世比较政治。", "M": "4.4", "budget": [ { "actor": "孟德斯鸠", "actorId": "SL-0124", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.42" }, { "actor": "罗马史料与古典史学前史", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::ROMAN-HISTORICAL-SOURCES-AND-CLASSICAL-HISTORIOGRAPHY", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.3" }, { "actor": "早期出版、编辑与阅读反馈", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::EARLY-PUBLICATION-EDITING-AND-READERS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.1" }, { "actor": "译者与后续编辑", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::TRANSLATORS-AND-LATER-EDITORS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "尚未解析的历史研究输入", "actorId": "MONTESQUIEU::UNRESOLVED-HISTORICAL-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.1" } ], "share": "0.42", "exactLight": "66.14551408336676637848825768244329455731656962065164086928446611729958827407506716462851440153666385", "light": "66.145514", "standaloneScore": "3.65", "lightSharePercent": "14.4755" } ], "exactTotalLight": "456.9470474521933192243976980135498090505039538809762615297136742729646441882525348149168136943580354", "totalLight": "456.947047", "exactScore": "5.321630526624163210280285049639729907882630173087882368880403478943236490858478628208314098315520050", "displayScore": "5.32", "provisionalCount": 3, "provenance": { "releaseId": "research-200-20260914", "baselineLedgerSha256": "8bdd406b3e20ae22357644499e622922c670ff11010df0478c70c23b38902108", "c24DeltaSha256": "b0b96144d1d3397e54a61c3d706ff2da5920fe7617e3bef50407149cb97d9d62", "generatorSha256": "25de659e9852503508e7c27d8a31773b8da5d6310531b1e3699d18cc94319929" }, "priorScopeNote": "3项已列贡献的研究估分，含3项暂估。账本覆盖有限的主要成果，尚未穷尽生涯。M与归功份额是可修订的评估判断；未覆盖经历和负面影响不按零处理。", "rank": 131 }