{ "personId": "sl-0781", "uid": "SL-0781", "name": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "version": "V2研究贡献账", "updatedAt": "2026-09-15", "formula": { "q": "Q = 10^(M/2) − 1", "light": "Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ", "total": "L = Σ Lᵢ", "score": "S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L)" }, "scopeNote": "本轮当前已列7项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。", "exclusions": [ { "id": "MILL-PARLIAMENTARY-SERVICE-OTHER-CAUSES", "title": "议会中的爱尔兰改革、Eyre追责及其他公共行动", "reason": "SEP可证倡议方向，但缺具体议案、发言、共同组织者和结果；妇女参政残余已并入女性平等点。" }, { "id": "MILL-EAST-INDIA-COMPANY-COLONIAL-ADMINISTRATION", "title": "东印度公司殖民行政工作", "reason": "可证担任通信主管，但职位不是正成果；具体文件、强制治理与殖民伤害尚未审，不能设服务M。" }, { "id": "MILL-AUTOBIOGRAPHY-AND-LITERARY-ESSAYS", "title": "自传与文学/文化批评", "reason": "现有来源用于思想发展背景，尚未证明独立主要文明终态。" } ], "items": [ { "id": "OUT-SL0781-1843-SYSTEM-OF-LOGIC-INDUCTION-AND-SCIENTIFIC-METHOD", "title": "《逻辑体系》的归纳、因果方法与科学方法论", "year": "1843", "summary": "把语言、证据、归纳和因果探究组织为统一方法体系，并明确四种隔离因果规律的比较程序及其背景条件限制。", "mReason": "SEP逐节确认其归纳体系及四方法，同时指出归纳自我支持、演绎认知和背景条件等争议；按跨学科方法体系的独立终态取M6.1，局限已进入边界。", "aReason": "Mill0.43，James Mill0.08，Bentham0.04，其他前史0.20，出版团队0.07，未解析0.18。", "sources": [ { "label": "文献与机构资料：seop.illc.uva.nl", "url": "https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/mill/" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.laits.utexas.edu", "url": "https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/sol/sol.b03.c10.html" } ], "missing": "历版修订和具体来源借鉴未逐条核。；四方法与Herschel等前驱的差分仍需专门方法史校准。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1843《逻辑体系》中经验主义知识论、归纳基础、求因果联系的同意法/差异法/剩余法/共变法，以及将方法扩展到社会科学的论证；排除现代统计因果、实验设计和后继科学成果。SEP称Harriet Taylor很少参与本书，故不硬分其份额。", "M": "6.1", "budget": [ { "actor": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "actorId": "SL-0781", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.43" }, { "actor": "James Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:JAMES-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "边沁", "actorId": "SL-2816", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.04" }, { "actor": "赫歇尔、惠威尔、孔德、休谟等经验逻辑前驱", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::HERSCHEL-WHEWELL-COMTE-HUME-AND-EMPIRICAL-LOGIC-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.2" }, { "actor": "《逻辑体系》评议、版本与出版人员", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::SYSTEM-OF-LOGIC-REVIEW-EDITION-AND-PUBLISHING-TEAM", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "未解析的《逻辑体系》贡献", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UNRESOLVED-MILL-SYSTEM-OF-LOGIC-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.18" } ], "share": "0.43", "exactLight": "482.0379353498442773041467469854994667905926581650377738513820127131444201550764730551986365980719064", "light": "482.037935", "standaloneScore": "5.37", "lightSharePercent": "18.5180" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0781-1859-ON-LIBERTY-HARM-DISCUSSION-INDIVIDUALITY", "title": "《论自由》的伤害原则、讨论自由与个性论证", "year": "1859", "summary": "把国家和社会舆论强制共同纳入分析，以伤害原则限制干预，并系统论证错误、部分真理和个性实验的知识价值。", "mReason": "原文第一章和SEP §§4.5–4.6确认伤害原则、讨论自由和个性三部分；按跨法律、政治与伦理的系统论证取M6.2。Harriet协作和“文明社会”例外均直接进入预算与净边界。", "aReason": "Mill0.38，Harriet0.23，其他前史0.16，原出版/论辩团队0.07，未解析0.16。", "sources": [ { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.econlib.org", "url": "https://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlLbty.html?chapter_num=1" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：seop.illc.uva.nl", "url": "https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/mill/" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：plato.stanford.edu", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/harriet-mill/" } ], "missing": "Mill/Harriet手稿分层尚未核，个人比例为保守候选。；文明等级例外的殖民应用史尚未闭合。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1859《论自由》关于社会对个人行使权力的限度、思想讨论、个性和行动自由的完整论证族；不领取现代宪法、言论平台规则、法院判例或社会运动。", "M": "6.2", "budget": [ { "actor": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "actorId": "SL-0781", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.38" }, { "actor": "Harriet Taylor Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:HARRIET-TAYLOR-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.23" }, { "actor": "托克维尔、洪堡与自由主义前驱", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::TOCQUEVILLE-HUMBOLDT-ROMANTIC-AND-LIBERAL-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.16" }, { "actor": "《论自由》编校、出版与同期讨论者", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::ON-LIBERTY-EDITORIAL-PUBLISHING-AND-PUBLIC-DEBATE-TEAM", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "未解析的《论自由》贡献", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UNRESOLVED-MILL-TAYLOR-ON-LIBERTY-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.16" } ], "share": "0.38", "exactLight": "478.0116564817835399611025604304042303155746155974338062610107474201260939973507691659993671848595446", "light": "478.011656", "standaloneScore": "5.36", "lightSharePercent": "18.3633" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0781-1848-1871-PRINCIPLES-POLITICAL-ECONOMY-SOCIAL-PHILOSOPHY", "title": "《政治经济学原理》的生产—分配与社会哲学综合", "year": "1848", "summary": "在古典生产分析中强调分配制度的可变性，并把经济规律与社会制度、改良和个体发展联系。", "mReason": "初版馆藏与SEP/Taylor协作条目证明主要文本及合作争议；按综合性经济—制度论著取M5.9，未以教科书传播或政策规模放大。", "aReason": "Mill0.39，Harriet0.12，James0.05，Ricardo0.07，其他前史0.13，出版/资料0.07，未解析0.17。", "sources": [ { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.otaru-uc.ac.jp", "url": "https://www.otaru-uc.ac.jp/htosyo1/siryo/yosho/Y_mill.htm" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：plato.stanford.edu", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/harriet-mill/" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：seop.illc.uva.nl", "url": "https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/mill/" } ], "missing": "未逐卷核生产/分配命题与历版差异。；殖民与文明等级章节尚需专门净边界审查。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1848起《政治经济学原理》对生产、分配、经济进步、财产与合作形式的经济—社会哲学综合及历版修订；不领取后世自由市场、福利、社会主义、合作社或经济政策成效。", "M": "5.9", "budget": [ { "actor": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "actorId": "SL-0781", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.39" }, { "actor": "Harriet Taylor Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:HARRIET-TAYLOR-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.12" }, { "actor": "James Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:JAMES-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "大卫·李嘉图", "actorId": "SL-0135", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "亚当·斯密、古典经济学与社会主义前驱", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::ADAM-SMITH-CLASSICAL-ECONOMY-AND-SOCIALIST-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.13" }, { "actor": "《政治经济学原理》编校与经济资料提供者", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::PRINCIPLES-EDITORS-PUBLISHERS-AND-ECONOMIC-DATA-SOURCES", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "未解析的政治经济学贡献", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UNRESOLVED-MILL-POLITICAL-ECONOMY-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.17" } ], "share": "0.39", "exactLight": "347.1978658721607566817123856205358159544911653427188642796979630763128751308415262175020359394354544", "light": "347.197866", "standaloneScore": "5.08", "lightSharePercent": "13.3379" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0781-1865-1869-WOMENS-EQUALITY-AND-SUFFRAGE-ARGUMENT", "title": "女性法律平等、婚姻批判与参政论证", "year": "1869", "summary": "把联想心理学用于反驳所谓女性“自然”能力差异，系统连接婚姻、教育、职业与政治代表的法律平等。", "mReason": "Oxford原文和SEP §4.4明确支持完全平等、性别差异由培养形成、婚姻权力与参政论证；按跨法律/家庭/政治的系统平等论证取M6.0，同时保留Harriet和既有女性思想者高份额。", "aReason": "Mill0.34，Harriet0.22，妇女权利前史0.18，倡议/出版团队0.11，未解析0.15。", "sources": [ { "label": "文献与机构资料：llds.phon.ox.ac.uk", "url": "https://llds.phon.ox.ac.uk/llds/xmlui/handle/20.500.14106/1928" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：seop.illc.uva.nl", "url": "https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/mill/" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：plato.stanford.edu", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/harriet-mill/" } ], "missing": "Harriet与Mill逐段分工、Helen Taylor编辑和请愿组织者尚未细分。；议会倡议的具体程序交付需Hansard原记录才能进一步估服务残余。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "《妇女的屈从》中反对法律从属、婚姻权力不平等、教育与职业排斥的论证，以及Mill任议员期间有记录的妇女参政倡议；不领取后世选举权立法、平等法和整个女权运动。", "M": "6.0", "budget": [ { "actor": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "actorId": "SL-0781", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.34" }, { "actor": "Harriet Taylor Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:HARRIET-TAYLOR-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.22" }, { "actor": "沃斯通克拉夫特、汤普森、惠勒等女权前驱", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::MARY-WOLLSTONECRAFT-WILLIAM-THOMPSON-ANNA-WHEELER-AND-WOMENS-RIGHTS-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.18" }, { "actor": "十九世纪妇女参政组织者、请愿者与出版者", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::NINETEENTH-CENTURY-WOMENS-SUFFRAGE-ORGANIZERS-PETITIONERS-AND-PUBLISHERS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.11" }, { "actor": "未解析的女性平等论证贡献", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UNRESOLVED-MILL-TAYLOR-WOMENS-EQUALITY-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.15" } ], "share": "0.34", "exactLight": "339.66", "light": "339.660000", "standaloneScore": "5.06", "lightSharePercent": "13.0484" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0781-1861-1863-UTILITARIANISM-QUALITY-JUSTICE-MORALITY", "title": "《功利主义》的快乐质量、人格与正义论证", "year": "1861", "summary": "在数量快乐框架中加入质量与有经验判断者，并尝试说明德性、人格和正义如何进入效用伦理。", "mReason": "SEP确认快乐质量、人格及正义论证的实质，也指出质量/数量权衡未具体说明及其是否偏离享乐主义的争议；按独立伦理体系修订取M5.8。", "aReason": "Mill0.42，Bentham0.15，James0.07，Harriet0.07，其他前史0.12，出版0.05，未解析0.12。", "sources": [ { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.earlymoderntexts.com", "url": "https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/mill1863.pdf" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：seop.illc.uva.nl", "url": "https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/mill/" } ], "missing": "Harriet对本书的具体份额缺手稿证据。；如何权衡快乐质量/数量与少数权利的理论缺口是成果内在限制。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1861连载/1863成书《功利主义》对效用原则、快乐质量、人格、德性与正义的辩护；不领取所有结果主义伦理、公共政策成本收益或后世功利主义学派。", "M": "5.8", "budget": [ { "actor": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "actorId": "SL-0781", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.42" }, { "actor": "边沁", "actorId": "SL-2816", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.15" }, { "actor": "James Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:JAMES-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "Harriet Taylor Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:HARRIET-TAYLOR-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "休谟、伊壁鸠鲁、亚里士多德等伦理学前驱", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::HUME-EPICURUS-ARISTOTLE-ROMANTIC-AND-MORAL-PHILOSOPHY-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.12" }, { "actor": "《功利主义》编校与出版人员", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UTILITARIANISM-EDITORIAL-AND-PUBLISHING-TEAM", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "未解析的《功利主义》贡献", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UNRESOLVED-MILL-UTILITARIANISM-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.12" } ], "share": "0.42", "exactLight": "333.1978585841982308676856787912829316873634653373034194787760503131213928204247657487800057758199168", "light": "333.197859", "standaloneScore": "5.05", "lightSharePercent": "12.8001" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0781-1861-REPRESENTATIVE-GOVERNMENT-PARTICIPATION-MINORITY-VOICE", "title": "代议政府、公共参与与少数意见的制度论证", "year": "1861", "summary": "把政府管理质量与公民能力发展并列为评价标准，并论证参与和少数意见进入代表制的制度价值。", "mReason": "原文第2–3章及第8章可证好政府双重标准、全民主权与少数意见论证；按制度分析体系取M5.8，同时因文明阶段、复数投票和殖民例外等不平等设计下调净边界。", "aReason": "Mill0.42，James0.07，Bentham0.06，Tocqueville0.06，其他前史0.14，出版0.05，未解析0.20。", "sources": [ { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.loc.gov", "url": "https://www.loc.gov/item/08004963/" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.laits.utexas.edu", "url": "https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/repgov/repgov.c02.s01.html" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.laits.utexas.edu", "url": "https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/repgov/repgov.c03.s02.html" }, { "label": "文献与机构资料：www.ditext.com", "url": "https://www.ditext.com/mill/rg/chapter8.html" } ], "missing": "复数投票、殖民治理和文明阶段章节需更完整净边界审读。；与Hare比例代表方案的具体传递关系未细分。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1861《代议政府论》关于好政府标准、全民最终主权、参与的教育作用、少数意见和制度适配的论证；不领取现代民主、比例代表制实施、议会制度或殖民行政成果。", "M": "5.8", "budget": [ { "actor": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "actorId": "SL-0781", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.42" }, { "actor": "James Mill", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:JAMES-MILL", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "边沁", "actorId": "SL-2816", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.06" }, { "actor": "托克维尔", "actorId": "SL-2821", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.06" }, { "actor": "代议、比例代表与公民参与理论前驱", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::REPRESENTATION-DEMOCRACY-PROPORTIONALITY-AND-CIVIC-PARTICIPATION-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.14" }, { "actor": "《代议政府论》编校与出版人员", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::REPRESENTATIVE-GOVERNMENT-EDITORIAL-AND-PUBLISHING-TEAM", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "未解析的《代议政府论》贡献", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UNRESOLVED-MILL-REPRESENTATIVE-GOVERNMENT-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.2" } ], "share": "0.42", "exactLight": "333.1978585841982308676856787912829316873634653373034194787760503131213928204247657487800057758199168", "light": "333.197859", "standaloneScore": "5.05", "lightSharePercent": "12.8001" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0781-1865-EXAMINATION-HAMILTON-RELATIVITY-KNOWLEDGE", "title": "《汉密尔顿哲学批判》的知识相对性与“感觉的恒常可能性”", "year": "1865", "summary": "在批判Hamilton的过程中，把外在对象重述为可反复实现的感觉可能性，并将物质、心灵与认知限度纳入统一经验主义论证。", "mReason": "SEP将该书列为四部最重要作品之一，并在§3.6逐项给出知识相对性、感觉恒常可能性和心灵问题；按独立理论哲学论著取M5.6。SEP同时指出其自然主义与观念论可能不相容，故不把体系完整性当既成真理。", "aReason": "Mill0.46，Hamilton0.12，其他经验主义/观念论前史0.18，出版/论争团队0.06，未解析0.18。", "sources": [ { "label": "文献与机构资料：seop.illc.uva.nl", "url": "https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/mill/" } ], "missing": "未逐章核Mill与Hamilton的具体引用、反驳和历版变化。；该理论与Berkeley、Hume及后世现象主义的差分仍需专门哲学史校准。", "status": "缺证暂估", "overlapNote": "1865《汉密尔顿爵士哲学批判》中知识相对性、外部世界作为“感觉的恒常可能性”、心灵连续性及经验主义—观念论张力；排除《逻辑体系》的一般归纳方法、后世现象主义和整个分析哲学。", "M": "5.6", "budget": [ { "actor": "约翰·斯图尔特·密尔", "actorId": "SL-0781", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.46" }, { "actor": "William Hamilton（苏格兰哲学家）", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:WILLIAM-HAMILTON-SCOTTISH-PHILOSOPHER", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.12" }, { "actor": "贝克莱、休谟与联想主义形而上学前驱", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::BERKELEY-HUME-ASSOCIATIONISM-AND-EMPIRICIST-METAPHYSICS-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.18" }, { "actor": "《汉密尔顿哲学批判》编校与出版人员", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::EXAMINATION-HAMILTON-EDITORIAL-REVIEW-AND-PUBLISHING-TEAM", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.06" }, { "actor": "未解析的《汉密尔顿哲学批判》贡献", "actorId": "JOHN-STUART-MILL::UNRESOLVED-MILL-EXAMINATION-HAMILTON-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.18" } ], "share": "0.46", "exactLight": "289.7803784608888947398056628462781777495548183065852132827555832634076739169359314835404711620800419", "light": "289.780378", "standaloneScore": "4.93", "lightSharePercent": "11.1322" } ], "exactTotalLight": "2603.083553333073930422138713465283554184940188086382496632398407099233848841054231419800522436086781", "totalLight": "2603.083553", "exactScore": "6.831309829354023770239460220068687740532820569696110036737241486895296306595539124830473446163035030", "displayScore": "6.83", "provisionalCount": 7, "provenance": { "releaseId": "research-200-20260914", "baselineLedgerSha256": "8bdd406b3e20ae22357644499e622922c670ff11010df0478c70c23b38902108", "c24DeltaSha256": "b0b96144d1d3397e54a61c3d706ff2da5920fe7617e3bef50407149cb97d9d62", "generatorSha256": "25de659e9852503508e7c27d8a31773b8da5d6310531b1e3699d18cc94319929" }, "priorScopeNote": "7项已列贡献的研究估分，含7项暂估。账本覆盖有限的主要成果，尚未穷尽生涯。M与归功份额是可修订的评估判断；未覆盖经历和负面影响不按零处理。", "rank": 23 }