{ "personId": "zhu-xi", "uid": "SL-0209", "name": "朱熹", "version": "V2研究贡献账", "updatedAt": "2026-09-15", "formula": { "q": "Q = 10^(M/2) − 1", "light": "Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ", "total": "L = Σ Lᵢ", "score": "S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L)" }, "scopeNote": "本轮当前已列6项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。", "exclusions": [ { "id": "ZHU-XI-LOCAL-ADMINISTRATION-AND-POLITICAL-MEASURES", "title": "地方行政与政治措施", "reason": "当前无具体法律、执行和受益/伤害链，不以官职计成果。" }, { "id": "ZHU-XI-YULEI-WENJI-POETRY-AND-OTHER-CORPUS", "title": "《朱子语类》、文集、诗歌与其他文本", "reason": "核心哲学、四书、主要经典校注、《近思录》和史学已分族；语录、书信与诗文的独立文学或记录残余尚未按文本核，不按卷数复制M。" } ], "items": [ { "id": "OUT-SL0209-C1170-1200-LI-QI-GEWU-JING-SYNTHESIS", "title": "理、气、格物与敬的道学综合", "summary": "将分散概念组织为贯通知识、行动与道德修养的系统，并在同时代论辩中明确边界。", "M": "6.4", "budget": [ { "actor": "朱熹", "actorId": "SL-0209", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.32" }, { "actor": "北宋道学前驱", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::NORTHERN-SONG-DA0XUE-ZHOU-ZHANG-CHENG-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.28" }, { "actor": "吕祖谦、陈亮等论辩者", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::LU-ZUQIAN-CHEN-LIANG-AND-ZHU-XI-INTERLOCUTORS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.12" }, { "actor": "门人记录与校理团队", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::ZHU-XI-STUDENTS-RECORDERS-AND-COLLATORS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "儒释道思想前史", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::CONFUCIAN-BUDDHIST-AND-DAOIST-INTELLECTUAL-PREHISTORY", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.1" }, { "actor": "未解析哲学综合归功", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::UNRESOLVED-ZHU-XI-SYNTHESIS-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.1" } ], "mReason": "M6.4按跨本体论、认识论和伦理实践的系统整合及长期可研究文本评估；不是把理气命题当科学事实，也未把后世官学权力算成个人成就。", "aReason": "朱熹.32，北宋道学前驱.28，论辩者.12，门人记录.08，宽思想前史.10，未解析.10。", "overlapNote": "12世纪后期朱熹把理、气、格物、敬和伦理修养连接成的哲学体系。排除全部宋明理学、四书原文、后世国家正统与哲学命题作为经验事实。 《近思录》选编、五经校注和四书注释的文本工具价值分别在对应点领取。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "未逐篇区分朱熹、门人记录与后期编本的概念措辞。；规范体系在不同社会群体中的直接约束后果尚未按制度史闭合。", "sources": [ { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zhu-xi/" } ], "year": "12世纪后期", "share": "0.32", "exactLight": "506.8458215875563152646724394852822442462214828240125018612149799413301963739052736352648716307555341", "light": "506.845822", "standaloneScore": "5.41", "lightSharePercent": "35.3269" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0209-C1190-FOUR-BOOKS-COMMENTARY-SYSTEM", "title": "四书编校、次序与章句集注体系", "summary": "把四部既有文本重组为连续学习框架，并形成具体章句、次序和研读工具；通用哲学体系价值消费自第一点。", "M": "6.3", "budget": [ { "actor": "朱熹", "actorId": "SL-0209", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.28" }, { "actor": "四书原作者与早期传递者", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::FOUR-BOOKS-ORIGINAL-AUTHORS-AND-EARLY-TRANSMITTERS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.32" }, { "actor": "汉唐及儒家注释前史", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::HAN-TANG-AND-CONFUCIAN-COMMENTARIAL-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.14" }, { "actor": "门人校理与讨论团队", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::ZHU-XI-FOUR-BOOKS-STUDENTS-COLLATORS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "约1190年原始刊刻链", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::C1190-FOUR-BOOKS-ORIGINAL-PUBLICATION-CHAIN", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "未解析四书注释归功", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::UNRESOLVED-ZHU-XI-FOUR-BOOKS-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "已计哲学综合输入", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::ZHU-XI-SYNTHESIS-CONSUMED-INPUT", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.05" } ], "mReason": "M6.3按大型注释终态、文本重组和可复用研读工具评估。后世科举采用说明奠基力，同时其正统化排他后果不归为个人直接实施。", "aReason": "朱熹.28，原作者传递者.32，注释前史.14，门人校理.08，原始刊刻.05，未解析.13。", "overlapNote": "《大学》《论语》《孟子》《中庸》的选择、编校、排序与《四书章句集注》解释体系。排除四书原文创作、元以后科举采用和后世所有儒家教育。 其中使用理、气、格物和敬的通用哲学关系只作为第一点输入，不在注释点重复。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "原刻、门人参与及朱熹生前各版本差异未完全闭合。；后世考试采用的净后果需另立制度史成果，不回灌本点。", "sources": [ { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zhu-xi/" }, { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://fourbooks.org/note-from-daoxue" } ], "year": "约1190", "share": "0.28", "exactLight": "395.2305124943712046035702019004674603411205220283551830553511967019625671136010035642824435101816972", "light": "395.230512", "standaloneScore": "5.20", "lightSharePercent": "27.5473" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0209-C1170-1200-CLASSICAL-CRITICAL-EDITIONS", "title": "《易》《诗》《楚辞》等经典校注与版本工具", "summary": "对多种经典形成批判版本、解释次序与可用注释；不重复通用哲学体系。", "M": "5.6", "budget": [ { "actor": "朱熹", "actorId": "SL-0209", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.3" }, { "actor": "经典原作者与早期传递者", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::CLASSICAL-TEXT-ORIGINAL-AUTHORS-AND-TRANSMITTERS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.32" }, { "actor": "汉唐宋经典注释前史", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::HAN-TANG-AND-SONG-CLASSICAL-COMMENTATORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.15" }, { "actor": "朱熹经典校理与门人团队", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::ZHU-XI-CLASSICAL-EDITIONS-COLLATORS-AND-STUDENTS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "经典校注原始刊刻链", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::ZHU-XI-CLASSICAL-EDITIONS-ORIGINAL-PUBLICATION", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "未解析经典校注归功", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::UNRESOLVED-ZHU-XI-CLASSICAL-EDITIONS-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "已计哲学综合输入", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::ZHU-XI-SYNTHESIS-CONSUMED-INPUT", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.05" } ], "mReason": "M5.6按多部主要经典的具体校注、版本与研读工具残余评估。SEP确认其对《易》《诗》《楚辞》和《参同契》的编辑注释；原文价值和理气体系不重复。", "aReason": "朱熹.30，原作者传递者.32，注释前史.15，门人校理.08，原始刊刻.05，未解析.10。", "overlapNote": "朱熹对《周易》《诗经》《楚辞》及《参同契》等主要经典所作的版本整理、注释和研读工具。排除原文创作、四书体系、通用理气哲学和后世校本。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "未逐部核生前版本、门人校勘和注释差异。；《楚辞》《参同契》相对前注的独立残余尚需文本对读。", "sources": [ { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zhu-xi/" } ], "year": "12世纪后期", "share": "0.3", "exactLight": "188.9872033440579748303080409867031594018835771564686173583188586500484829893060422718742203230956795", "light": "188.987203", "standaloneScore": "4.56", "lightSharePercent": "13.1723" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0209-C1179-WHITE-DEER-GROTTO-LEARNING-ARTICLES", "title": "白鹿洞书院揭示与教育纲领", "summary": "将读书、伦理关系与实践秩序编成可供书院使用的明确教育文本。", "M": "5.2", "budget": [ { "actor": "朱熹", "actorId": "SL-0209", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.3" }, { "actor": "白鹿洞书院教育与管理者", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::WHITE-DEER-GROTTO-ACADEMY-EDUCATORS-AND-ADMINISTRATORS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.12" }, { "actor": "白鹿洞书院", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::WHITE-DEER-GROTTO-ACADEMY", "type": "INSTITUTION", "share": "0.18" }, { "actor": "儒家书院与学规前史", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::CONFUCIAN-ACADEMY-AND-LEARNING-RULES-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.18" }, { "actor": "揭示原始传写刊布链", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::WHITE-DEER-ARTICLES-ORIGINAL-TEXT-TRANSMISSION", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.05" }, { "actor": "未解析白鹿洞归功", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::UNRESOLVED-WHITE-DEER-LEARNING-ARTICLES-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.17" } ], "mReason": "M5.2按明确教育文本和有限制度使用评估；现有预览不能证明日常执行规模，因此不把书院复兴或全部教学效果归给该文本。", "aReason": "朱熹.30，教育管理者.12，书院.18，教育前史.18，传写刊布.05，未解析.17。", "overlapNote": "朱熹起草的《白鹿洞书院揭示》学习纲领及当时书院中的有限制度承载。排除白鹿洞全部历史、所有书院、学生未来成果和中国教育制度。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "缺书院档案核复兴、共同起草与实际执行。；未核学生、教师对规则的反馈和偏离。", "sources": [ { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://brill.com/display/book/9789004424074/BP000010.pdf" } ], "year": "约1179", "share": "0.3", "exactLight": "119.1321511660491752310756915263256130463031111892141340595852444180674561608374117222054934822132081", "light": "119.132151", "standaloneScore": "4.16", "lightSharePercent": "8.3034" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0209-C1172-ZIZHI-TONGJIAN-GANGMU-HISTORIOGRAPHY", "title": "《资治通鉴纲目》的纲目史学编纂方法", "summary": "以大纲与细目重排材料，形成便于把握历史结构并作规范判断的编纂终态。", "M": "5.5", "budget": [ { "actor": "朱熹", "actorId": "SL-0209", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.2" }, { "actor": "《纲目》门人编纂团队", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::ZHU-XI-GANGMU-STUDENTS-AND-COMPILERS", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.25" }, { "actor": "司马光《资治通鉴》编纂群体", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::SIMA-GUANG-ZIZHI-TONGJIAN-AND-COMPILERS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.25" }, { "actor": "中国编年史学前史", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::CHINESE-ANNALISTIC-HISTORIOGRAPHY-PREDECESSORS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.1" }, { "actor": "《纲目》早期刊刻传递链", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::GANGMU-EARLY-PUBLICATION-AND-TRANSMISSION", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "未解析《纲目》归功", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::UNRESOLVED-ZHU-XI-GANGMU-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.12" } ], "mReason": "M5.5按独立编纂结构、可复用史学格式与长期文本影响评估。其道德化和正统判断可能压缩史实复杂性，故不把流行等同准确。", "aReason": "朱熹.20，门人编纂.25，司马光原作.25，史学前史.10，刊刻传递.08，未解析.12。", "overlapNote": "以司马光《资治通鉴》为材料重组的纲目体历史编纂和历史判断方法。排除原史事、司马光原作、后世续编及其全部政治教育效果。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "朱熹与学生的逐卷作者关系、身后刊本和文本变动未完全闭合。；尚未逐段检验史实选择与道德判断偏差。", "sources": [ { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/making-of-song-dynasty-history/daoxue-historians/59C1A772C2D0D884298A7292E0741399" } ], "year": "约1172；身后完成刊行", "share": "0.2", "exactLight": "112.2682650380698160789902079552962462936502086197383328163378847471767137286125697811715969052440612", "light": "112.268265", "standaloneScore": "4.11", "lightSharePercent": "7.8250" }, { "id": "OUT-SL0209-1175-JINSILU-NEO-CONFUCIAN-ANTHOLOGY", "title": "与吕祖谦合编《近思录》的道学选编工具", "summary": "把分散原文选择、排序为面向学习者的系统入门读本。", "M": "5.5", "budget": [ { "actor": "朱熹", "actorId": "SL-0209", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.2" }, { "actor": "吕祖谦", "actorId": "EXT-NAME:LU-ZUQIAN", "type": "PERSON", "share": "0.2" }, { "actor": "北宋道学诸家原文", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::NORTHERN-SONG-MASTERS-SOURCE-TEXTS", "type": "PREDECESSOR_POOL", "share": "0.3" }, { "actor": "《近思录》校理与传写团队", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::JINSILU-COLLATORS-STUDENTS-AND-SCRIBES", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.08" }, { "actor": "《近思录》原始刊传链", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::JINSILU-ORIGINAL-PUBLICATION-AND-TRANSMISSION", "type": "TEAM", "share": "0.07" }, { "actor": "未解析《近思录》归功", "actorId": "ZHU-XI::UNRESOLVED-JINSILU-ATTRIBUTION", "type": "UNALLOCATED", "share": "0.15" } ], "mReason": "M5.5按具名双人编纂、跨作者选材和可复用入门结构评估。它只领选择、次序和编辑残余，原文思想价值仍归源作者。", "aReason": "朱熹.20，吕祖谦.20，源文作者.30，校理传写.08，刊传.07，未解析.15。", "overlapNote": "1175年朱熹与吕祖谦从北宋道学原文合编《近思录》，形成自我修养与哲学学习的选编工具。排除源文原创、朱熹通用哲学体系及后世教学使用。", "status": "缺证暂估", "missing": "两位编者逐条选择和修改责任未闭合。；早期版本、刊刻和读者使用史尚未核全。", "sources": [ { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zhu-xi/" }, { "label": "作品、机构记录与学术研究", "url": "https://cswr.hds.harvard.edu/news/2024/04/17/self-cultivation-neo-confucian-and-ignatian-dialogue" } ], "year": "1175", "share": "0.2", "exactLight": "112.2682650380698160789902079552962462936502086197383328163378847471767137286125697811715969052440612", "light": "112.268265", "standaloneScore": "4.11", "lightSharePercent": "7.8250" } ], "exactTotalLight": "1434.732218668174302087606789809370969622829110437527101967146049205762130094874870755970222756734241", "totalLight": "1434.732219", "exactScore": "6.314146892626780683755516359785471791445955721769691569085553960628027405238500295515730227553628598", "displayScore": "6.31", "provisionalCount": 6, "provenance": { "releaseId": "research-200-20260914", "baselineLedgerSha256": "8bdd406b3e20ae22357644499e622922c670ff11010df0478c70c23b38902108", "c24DeltaSha256": "b0b96144d1d3397e54a61c3d706ff2da5920fe7617e3bef50407149cb97d9d62", "generatorSha256": "25de659e9852503508e7c27d8a31773b8da5d6310531b1e3699d18cc94319929" }, "priorScopeNote": "6项已列贡献的研究估分，含6项暂估。账本覆盖有限的主要成果，尚未穷尽生涯。M与归功份额是可修订的评估判断；未覆盖经历和负面影响不按零处理。", "rank": 48 }