Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Hyman G. Rickover
Recorded name: 海曼·里科弗
Hyman Rickover was a U.S. Navy officer and leader of a nuclear-propulsion program who also helped lead construction of the civilian Shippingport nuclear power station.
Original Chinese introduction
海曼·里科弗是美国海军军官与核推进项目负责人，也参与领导希平港民用核电站建设。
Rickover led the U.S. naval nuclear-propulsion program over many years, linking reactor engineering, shipbuilding, personnel training, and operating responsibility. Related experience was subsequently transferred to Shippingport, whose participants included the Atomic Energy Commission, Westinghouse, and Duquesne Light. The naval program and civilian power station have different uses; their safety responsibilities and long-term consequences must be considered separately.
Original Chinese context
里科弗长期领导美国海军核推进项目，将反应堆工程、造船、人员训练与运行责任结合起来。相关经验随后被转用于希平港电站，参与者包括原子能委员会、西屋公司和杜肯照明公司。海军项目与民用电站具有不同用途，涉及的安全责任和长期后果也需要分别考察。
Introduction sources
- U.S. Department of Energy: history of the nuclear-propulsion program ↗Original Chinese label · 美国能源部：核推进计划历史
- U.S. Naval Institute: Rickover and the Nuclear Navy ↗Original Chinese label · 美国海军研究所：Rickover and the Nuclear Navy
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
1 included contribution has incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This research record currently includes 1 outcome within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列1项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
1 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01Engineering delivery of the Shippingport civilian pressurized-water-reactor power plant希平港民用压水堆电站的工程交付OUT-SL1242-1953-1958-SHIPPINGPORT-CIVILIAN-PWR-DELIVERY · 1953–1958 | 6.1 | 15% | 168.152768 | 4.46 | 100.0000% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
01Engineering delivery of the Shippingport civilian pressurized-water-reactor power plant希平港民用压水堆电站的工程交付OUT-SL1242-1953-1958-SHIPPINGPORT-CIVILIAN-PWR-DELIVERY
Record year1953–1958
summaryTurned pressurized-water-reactor experience into an operational full-scale civilian central power station, establishing an industrial delivery and cross-institutional project model open to public examination.
Original Chinese · summary
把压水反应堆经验转成可运行的全规模民用中央电站，并形成公开可考察的工业交付和跨机构项目模式。
M rationaleAccording to DOE's official project history, Shippingport began operating in 1957 as the first full-scale nuclear power plant in the United States and served as a model for nuclear-power development for more than a decade. M6.1 assesses the operable civilian end state of this large cross-institutional energy system, below the scope of claiming the entire nuclear-power industry and without counting the value of the military fleet.
Original Chinese · M rationale
DOE正式项目史称Shippingport于1957年运行，是美国首个全规模核电站，并在十余年内作为核电开发模型。M6.1评这项跨机构大型能源系统的可运行民用终态，低于把整个核电产业归入的范围，也不消费军用舰队价值。
attribution rationaleRickover .15; Westinghouse/Bettis .25; Duquesne .15; AEC .15; Naval Reactors civilian-transfer team .12; prior technical development .10; unresolved .08.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Rickover .15，Westinghouse/Bettis .25，Duquesne .15，AEC .15，海军反应堆民用转移团队 .12，技术前史 .10，未解析 .08。
overlap boundary1953–1958 design, construction, grid connection, and public engineering demonstration of the first full-scale civilian pressurized-water-reactor power plant in the United States, at Shippingport. Excludes naval nuclear vessels, nuclear weapons, the entire subsequent light-water-reactor industry, later breeder-reactor stages, and unverified achievements of each supplier.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1953–1958 Shippingport首个美国全规模民用压水堆电站的设计、建造、并网及公开工程示范。排除海军核舰艇、核武器、后世全部轻水堆产业、增殖堆后续阶段和每个供应商的未核成果。
Evidence gapsSpecific reactor-core, plant-site, supplier, and regulatory responsibilities have not yet been established item by item. Waste, decommissioning, radiation risks, and actual lifecycle costs require project-specific historical calibration.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
具体堆芯、厂站、供应商和监管责任未逐项闭合。；废物、退役、辐射风险与实际全生命周期成本需专门项目史校准。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.15Hyman RickoverOriginal Chinese · 海曼·里科弗Person
- 0.25Westinghouse, Bettis, and Shippingport reactor engineering teamOriginal Chinese · 西屋、贝蒂斯与希平港反应堆工程团队Team
- 0.15Duquesne Light and Shippingport operations teamOriginal Chinese · 杜肯照明公司与希平港运行团队Team
- 0.15U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Shippingport programOriginal Chinese · 美国原子能委员会希平港计划Institution
- 0.12Naval Reactors civilian-transfer teamOriginal Chinese · 海军反应堆项目民用转移团队Team
- 0.1Precursors in nuclear fission, reactors, and pressurized-water reactorsOriginal Chinese · 核裂变、反应堆与压水堆前驱Predecessor pool
- 0.08Shippingport contributions pending resolutionOriginal Chinese · 待核定的希平港贡献Unallocated
Source links
- Primary materials and institutional history ↗Original Chinese label · 原始资料与机构史
- Primary materials and institutional history ↗Original Chinese label · 原始资料与机构史
BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED
Not included in this score
These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.
Organization, fleet expansion, and long-term operating system of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program
海军核推进计划的组织、舰队扩展与长期运行体系
Reason DOE material supports Rickover's part in establishing dual AEC–Navy responsibility and expanding the program to fleet production, maintenance, and operation, but the delivery directly strengthened warships and strategic combat capacity. Current evidence cannot compare the net consequences of propulsion reliability and personnel protection against military violence and nuclear risk; technical success cannot set M/a.
Original Chinese reason
DOE资料支持Rickover参与建立AEC—海军双重责任并把项目扩至舰队生产、维护和运行，但交付直接增强军舰及战略作战能力。现证据无法比较推进可靠性、人员保护与军事暴力、核风险的净后果，不能以技术成功设M/a。
Naval Reactors personnel selection, training, and safety-responsibility system
Naval Reactors人员遴选、训练与安全责任体系
Reason Training, quality standards, and continuing operational responsibility are necessary organizational components of the military nuclear-propulsion parent outcome and do not duplicate M; specific curricula, selection records, critiques of occupational culture, and accident responsibility remain absent.
Original Chinese reason
训练、质量标准和持续运行责任是军用核推进母成果的必要组织组成，不另复制M；尚缺具体课程、遴选档案、职业文化批评和事故责任。
Educational writings, testimony, and public-administration claims
教育论述、证词与公共管理主张
Reason The current package supplies no independent textual method or institutional end state; public statements, offices, or number of hearings are not counted.
Original Chinese reason
现包未给出独立文本方法或制度终态，不按公开人物言论、职位或听证次数计点。
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →