Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Abdullah bin Hamad Al-Attiyah
Recorded name: 阿卜杜拉·本·哈马德·阿蒂亚
Abdullah Al Attiyah is a former Qatari energy official who presided over the 2012 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Doha.
Original Chinese introduction
阿卜杜拉·阿蒂亚是卡塔尔前能源官员,曾主持2012年多哈联合国气候变化大会。
Al Attiyah was long involved in Qatari energy-industry administration and chaired the Doha climate conference. Document submission and consultation coordination at the conference depended on joint work by national delegations, the Secretariat, working groups, and the presidency team. Doha continued the negotiating process; the strength and implementation of its commitments remain under scrutiny.
Original Chinese context
阿蒂亚长期参与卡塔尔能源产业行政,并担任多哈气候大会主席。大会中的文件提交和磋商协调依赖各国代表、秘书处、工作组与主席团队共同完成。多哈延续了谈判进程,其承诺力度和实施效果也受到持续审视。
- UNFCCC COP18 presidency biography ↗Original Chinese label · UNFCCC COP18主席履历
- UNFCCC Doha conference and final decisions ↗Original Chinese label · UNFCCC多哈会议与最终决定
- President's final stocktaking statement ↗Original Chinese label · 主席最终盘点讲话
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
1 included contribution has incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This research record currently includes 1 outcome within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列1项有限研究账;M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理,具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
1 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01COP18 Presidency procedures, consultation organization, and submitted-package contributionCOP18主席程序、磋商组织与方案提交残余OUT-SL2180-2012-COP18-PRESIDENCY-PROCEDURAL-DELIVERY · 2012 | 5.0 | 10% | 31.522777 | 3.02 | 100.0000% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
01COP18 Presidency procedures, consultation organization, and submitted-package contributionCOP18主席程序、磋商组织与方案提交残余OUT-SL2180-2012-COP18-PRESIDENCY-PROCEDURAL-DELIVERY
Record year2012
summaryThe Presidency convened ministers and working groups to address key pending items, and submitted multiple documents as an adoptable Doha Climate Gateway procedural package.
Original Chinese · summary
组织部长与工作组处理关键未决项,并把多份文件提交为可通过的Doha Climate Gateway程序包。
M rationaleM5.0 assesses only demonstrable presidency procedures and the submitted-package contribution, while including the Doha package's low ambition, insufficient implementation, and solidification of compromises within the same outcome boundary. The reduction from the earlier M5.3 is not an evidence-confidence discount; it corrects a prior scope mismatch in which the value of complete party proposals supported a narrow presidency procedure.
Original Chinese · M rationale
M5.0只评可证的主席程序与方案提交残余,并把多哈方案低雄心、执行不足和妥协固化纳入同一成果边界。相对原M5.3下调不是证据置信折扣,而是修正了此前用完整缔约方方案价值支撑狭窄主席程序的scope错位。
attribution rationaleAl-Attiyah .10; Presidency Office .18; UNFCCC Secretariat .24; working-group chairs and technical teams .18; ministerial coordinators .10; delegation procedural inputs .10; host logistics .03; prior negotiation development .04; unresolved .03.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Al-Attiyah.10,主席办公室.18,UNFCCC秘书处.24,工作组主席与技术团队.18,部长协调者.10,代表团程序输入.10,主办后勤.03,谈判前史.04,未解析.03。
overlap boundaryThe 2012 COP18/CMP8 Presidency team's procedural leadership, organization of ministerial consultations, assignment of pending agenda items, and submission of the final document package. Direct procedural consequences include extending the Kyoto Protocol's second commitment period and clearing the agenda for later negotiations, as well as low ambition, insufficient implementation, and solidification of compromises; excludes attributing the content of decisions, national policies, or global emissions reductions to individuals.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
2012年COP18/CMP8主席团队的程序主持、部长磋商组织、未决议题分派和最终文件包提交。直接程序后果包括延长京都第二承诺期和清理后续谈判议程,也包括低雄心、执行不足和妥协固化;排除把各决定内容、各国政策与全球减排归个人。
Evidence gapsItem-by-item drafting and consultation logs from the Presidency Office, Secretariat, and working groups are lacking. The direct climate, distributional, and delay consequences of each element of the Doha package are not fully established, and individuals do not claim the complete package.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
缺主席办公室、秘书处和工作组逐项起草/磋商日志。;Doha方案各项直接气候、分配与延误后果未完全闭合,个人不领取完整方案。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.1Abdullah bin Hamad Al AttiyahOriginal Chinese · 阿卜杜拉·本·哈马德·阿蒂亚Person
- 0.18COP18 presidency office and procedural teamOriginal Chinese · COP18主席办公室与程序团队Team
- 0.24UNFCCC SecretariatOriginal Chinese · UNFCCC秘书处Institution
- 0.18COP18 working-group chairs and technical teamsOriginal Chinese · COP18工作组主席与技术团队Team
- 0.1COP18 ministerial-consultation facilitatorsOriginal Chinese · COP18部长级磋商协调者Team
- 0.1COP18 Party delegations' procedural inputOriginal Chinese · COP18缔约方程序输入Team
- 0.03Qatar COP18 host logisticsOriginal Chinese · 卡塔尔COP18主办后勤Institution
- 0.04Prehistory of Durban, Kyoto, and climate negotiationsOriginal Chinese · 德班、京都与气候谈判前史Predecessor pool
- 0.03Unresolved attribution for COP18 procedureOriginal Chinese · 未解析COP18程序归功Unallocated
Source links
- Institutional-history research and conference records ↗Original Chinese label · 制度史研究与会议记录
- Institutional-history research and conference records ↗Original Chinese label · 制度史研究与会议记录
- Institutional-history research and conference records ↗Original Chinese label · 制度史研究与会议记录
BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED
Not included in this score
These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.
Qatari energy-industry administration and state-enterprise governance
卡塔尔能源产业行政与国企治理
Reason Current sources contain only post-1992 ministerial and Qatar Petroleum chair biographies; they do not identify specific projects, personal decisions, worker/engineering teams, economic gains, or harms from fossil-fuel emissions. National industrial expansion cannot set a positive M.
Original Chinese reason
现有来源只有1992后部长和Qatar Petroleum董事长履历,未识别具体项目、个人决策、工人/工程团队、经济收益及化石燃料排放损害;不能以国家产业扩张设正M。
Work as chair of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development
联合国可持续发展委员会主席工作
Reason The 2006 chair position is established, but specific documents, negotiations, or institutional delivery are absent; the appointment is not scored.
Original Chinese reason
2006主席职位已证,但缺具体文件、谈判或制度交付,不以任职计分。
Later foundation and transparency roles
后期基金会与透明度职务
Reason There is currently no evidence of a specific project or independent end state.
Original Chinese reason
当前无具体项目和独立终态证据。
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →