Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Kerim Kerimov
Recorded name: 克里姆·克里莫夫
Kerim Kerimov was a Soviet space-program leader who chaired the State Commission for crewed flight over many years.
Original Chinese introduction
克里姆·克里莫夫是苏联航天项目负责人，长期主持载人飞行国家委员会。
From 1966 to 1991, Kerimov chaired the State Commission for crewed flight, participating in supervision and launch coordination for Soyuz spacecraft and missions leading to the Salyut and Mir space stations. The Commission had to bring together information from design bureaus, manufacturing divisions, launch sites, and flight operations to make collective review and release decisions. Tensions among mission schedules, technical readiness, and crew safety are important context for this work.
Original Chinese context
1966至1991年，克里莫夫主持载人飞行国家委员会，参与联盟飞船及通往礼炮、和平号空间站任务的监督与发射协调。委员会需要汇集设计局、制造部门、发射场和飞行运行的信息，作出集体审查与放行决定。任务进度、技术准备和载人安全之间的冲突，是这一时期工作的重要背景。
Introduction sources
- NASA space history: Rockets and People, Volume II ↗Original Chinese label · NASA航天史：Rockets and People 第二卷
- NASA space history: Rockets and People, Volume IV ↗Original Chinese label · NASA航天史：Rockets and People 第四卷
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
1 included contribution has incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This research record currently includes 1 outcome within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列1项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
1 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01Inter-agency oversight and launch coordination by the State Commission for Soyuz, Salyut, and Mir crewed missionsSoyuz及Salyut、Mir载人任务国家委员会的跨机构监督与发射协调OUT-SL3154-1966-1991-SOYUZ-SALYUT-MIR-FLIGHT-COMMISSION-COORDINATION · 1966–1991 | 5.7 | 15% | 106.041868 | 4.06 | 100.0000% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
01Inter-agency oversight and launch coordination by the State Commission for Soyuz, Salyut, and Mir crewed missionsSoyuz及Salyut、Mir载人任务国家委员会的跨机构监督与发射协调OUT-SL3154-1966-1991-SOYUZ-SALYUT-MIR-FLIGHT-COMMISSION-COORDINATION
Record year1966–1991
summaryMaintained collective flight-authorization and coordination interfaces across design bureaus, manufacturing, launch sites, and flight operations through a twenty-five-year crewed-flight sequence; this is not equivalent to the engineering design of any generation of space station or spacecraft.
Original Chinese · summary
在持续二十五年的载人飞行序列中维持跨设计局、制造、发射场和飞行运行的集体放行与协调接口；不等同任何一代空间站或飞船的工程设计。
M rationaleNASA's history does more than establish the office held: it gives Kerimov's tenure as 1966–1991 and states that he oversaw nearly all Soviet crewed missions, including Soyuz, Salyut, and Mir, while 1971 meeting records provide concrete evidence of chairing, agenda-setting, and convening. M5.7 assesses sustained cross-program flight authorization and coordination services, excluding the Almaz military route and specific engineering design; compared with the earlier 1966–1971 M5.2, its value reflects twenty years of added verifiable mission service within the scope rather than accumulation by tenure or mission count.
Original Chinese · M rationale
NASA历史不只证明职位：它把Kerimov的任期定为1966–1991并称其监督几乎所有苏联载人任务、包括Soyuz、Salyut和Mir，同时1971会议记录提供实际主持、日程与召集动作。M5.7评持续跨项目飞行放行与协调服务，已排除Almaz军用路线和具体工程设计；高于原只覆盖1966–1971的M5.2，是范围中新增二十年可证任务服务的价值，而非按任期或任务数累加。
attribution rationaleKerimov .15; commission .21; mission-specific engineering departments .25; general design, manufacturing, launch, and operations .17; prior development .10; unresolved .12.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Kerimov .15，委员会 .21，任务专项工程部门 .25，一般设计制造发射运行 .17，前史 .10，未解析 .12。
overlap boundaryFrom 1966–1991, the State Commission for Crewed Flight provided flight authorization, oversight, and inter-agency coordination for Soyuz test flights and Soyuz launches to Salyut and Mir; the 1971 meeting is a concrete action example. Excludes some Soyuz-T, all military Almaz missions, spacecraft, rocket, and space-station design and manufacturing, in-orbit research content, and the entire Soviet space program.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1966–1991年载人飞行国家委员会对Soyuz试飞以及飞往Salyut、Mir的Soyuz发射所作飞行放行、监督与跨机构协调；1971会议是具体行动实例。排除部分Soyuz-T、全部军用Almaz任务、飞船/火箭/空间站设计制造、在轨科研内容及整个苏联航天。
Evidence gapsVoting, safety objections, and the chair's actions for individual Salyut/Mir missions have not been fully established; the current estimate is bounded by NASA's stated oversight scope and the 1971 example. NASA offers a U.S. historical-research and annotated-translation perspective; original commission records are needed to cross-check Soyuz-T exceptions and particular responsibilities.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
各次Salyut/Mir任务的表决、安全异议与主席逐次行动没有闭合；当前以NASA所述监督范围与1971实例作有界暂估。；NASA为美国历史研究与译注视角，需委员会原始记录交叉核实Soyuz-T例外及具体责任。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.15Kerim KerimovOriginal Chinese · 克里姆·克里莫夫Person
- 0.21Piloted-spaceflight State Commission members and secretariatOriginal Chinese · 载人航天国家委员会成员与秘书处Team
- 0.25Soyuz, Salyut, and Mir mission-specific engineering departmentsOriginal Chinese · 联盟、礼炮与和平号任务专项工程部门Team
- 0.17Spacecraft manufacturing, launch-site, and flight-operations teamsOriginal Chinese · 航天制造、发射场与飞行运行团队Team
- 0.1Precursors in Soviet rockets, crewed flight, and test commissionsOriginal Chinese · 苏联火箭、载人飞行与试验委员会前驱Predecessor pool
- 0.12Unallocated contributions to commission coordinationOriginal Chinese · 委员会协调工作未分配贡献Unallocated
Source links
- NASA space-history materials ↗Original Chinese label · NASA航天历史资料
- NASA space-history materials ↗Original Chinese label · NASA航天历史资料
- NASA space-history materials ↗Original Chinese label · NASA航天历史资料
BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED
Not included in this score
These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.
Early military missile and weapons acceptance
早期军方导弹与武器验收
Reason Current evidence does not yet establish specific project responsibilities, acceptance decisions, or direct consequences.
Original Chinese reason
现有证据尚未明确具体项目职责、验收决策及直接后果。
Space-history memoir materials
航天史回忆材料
Reason They establish only that multiple people published memoirs; the original books have not been read, so an independent historical increment cannot be judged.
Original Chinese reason
只证多人发表回忆录，未读原书，不能判断独立史学增量。
Roles in early projects such as Sputnik and Vostok
Sputnik/Vostok等早期项目角色
Reason The initial package does not establish specific responsibilities; participation in Soviet spaceflight does not attribute an entire project to the individual.
Original Chinese reason
初包未证明具体职责，不以苏联航天参与者身份归整个项目。
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →