Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Theo van Boven
Recorded name: 特奥·范博芬
Theo van Boven is a Dutch international-law scholar who served as Director of the UN Human Rights Division and Special Rapporteur on torture.
Original Chinese introduction
特奥·范博芬是荷兰国际法学者，曾任联合国人权司主任和反酷刑问题特别报告员。
Van Boven studied victims' rights to reparation for gross human-rights violations, submitted reports and draft principles to the UN, and participated in subsequent revisions. He also pursued torture issues through country visits, reports, and recommendations. Formulation of a legal framework, creation of investigative records, and whether rights are realized are distinct work and outcomes.
Original Chinese context
范博芬研究严重人权侵害受害者的赔偿权，向联合国提交报告与原则草案，并参与后续修订。他也通过国别访问、报告和建议追踪酷刑问题。法律框架的提出、调查记录的形成与权利是否得到落实，是不同的工作与结果。
Introduction sources
- UN 1993 reparation-rights report record ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国1993赔偿权报告记录
- UN 1993 final-report PDF ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国1993最终报告PDF
- OHCHR Spain visit report ↗Original Chinese label · OHCHR西班牙访问报告
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
2 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This research record currently includes 2 outcomes within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列2项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
2 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01Victim compensation rights research and draft principles (1989–1997)受害者赔偿权研究与原则草案（1989–1997）OUT-SL4401-1989-1993-REPARATION-RIGHTS-PRINCIPLES · 1989–1997 | 6.0 | 30% | 299.700000 | 4.96 | 80.8988% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 02Country visit and report on the issue of torture in Spain.西班牙酷刑问题国别访问与报告OUT-SL4401-2003-2004-SPAIN-TORTURE-RAPPORTEUR-REPORT · 2003–2004 | 5.1 | 20% | 70.762678 | 3.71 | 19.1012% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
01Victim compensation rights research and draft principles (1989–1997)受害者赔偿权研究与原则草案（1989–1997）OUT-SL4401-1989-1993-REPARATION-RIGHTS-PRINCIPLES
Record year1989–1997
summarySynthesizing legal sources, state practice, and victim reparation issues into a report and draft principles, revised according to UN review comments.
Original Chinese · summary
综合法律来源、国家实践和受害者赔偿问题，形成报告与原则草案，并按联合国审议意见修订。
M rationaleThe main final report and ongoing revisions form a systematic legal framework spanning international norms, state responsibility, adjudication, and domestic practice; subsequent revisions are incorporated into the original M6.0, without adding a new item due to an additional document number.
Original Chinese · M rationale
主要最终报告与持续修订形成跨国际规范、国家责任、裁判和国内实践的系统法律框架；后续修订合并入原M6.0，不因增加文号再增一项。
attribution rationaleTheo van Boven .30; UN Sub-Commission and members' discussions .22; UN Human Rights Secretariat and researchers .13; International, regional, and domestic legal antecedents .18; Human rights and victim reparation initiative antecedents .10; Unresolved share .07. Shares are revisable research judgments.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
特奥·范博芬 .30；联合国小组委员会及成员讨论 .22；联合国人权秘书处与研究人员 .13；国际、区域与国内法律前史 .18；人权与受害者赔偿倡议前史 .10；未解析份额 .07。份额为可修订研究判断。
overlap boundaryCounting the 1989 mandate through the 1993 final research report and the 1996–97 revisions to the draft principles based on committee and working group comments, as a continuous chain of legal knowledge and institutional design; not counting the 2005 final adoption, national reparation implementations, or court adjudications.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
计1989授权至1993最终研究报告及1996–97根据委员会和工作组意见作出的赔偿原则草案修订，作为一条连续法律知识和制度设计链；不领取2005最终采用、各国赔偿实施或法院裁判。
Evidence gapsNot paragraph-by-paragraph verification of all 56 pages of the original report against the 1997 revisions; The responsibility for paragraph-by-paragraph rewriting by committees, working groups, and researchers remains unresolved; the 2005 adoption is not within this scope.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
未逐段核全部56页原报告与1997修订异同。；委员会、工作组和研究人员逐段改写责任尚未闭合；2005采用不在本范围。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- .30Theo van BovenOriginal Chinese · 特奥·范博芬Person
- .22UN Sub-Commission and member discussionsOriginal Chinese · 联合国小组委员会及成员讨论Institution
- .13UN human-rights secretariat and researchersOriginal Chinese · 联合国人权秘书处与研究人员Team
- .18Prehistory of international, regional, and domestic lawOriginal Chinese · 国际、区域与国内法律前史Predecessor pool
- .10Prehistory of human-rights and victim-reparation advocacyOriginal Chinese · 人权与受害者赔偿倡议前史Predecessor pool
- .07Unresolved shareOriginal Chinese · 未解析份额Unallocated
Source links
- UN primary reports and institutional archives ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国原报告与机构档案
- UN primary reports and institutional archives ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国原报告与机构档案
- UN primary reports and institutional archives ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国原报告与机构档案
- UN primary reports and institutional archives ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国原报告与机构档案
- UN primary reports and institutional archives ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国原报告与机构档案
02Country visit and report on the issue of torture in Spain.西班牙酷刑问题国别访问与报告OUT-SL4401-2003-2004-SPAIN-TORTURE-RAPPORTEUR-REPORT
Record year2003–2004
summaryOrganizing country-specific allegations, legal framework, institutional interviews, and prevention recommendations into a public oversight document.
Original Chinese · summary
将国别指控、法律框架、机构会谈与预防建议组织为公开监督文本。
M rationaleWith specific visits, investigation subjects, and report delivery, reaching the magnitude of medium international oversight services; whether evidence and recommendations are adopted is not an automatic gain for M.
Original Chinese · M rationale
有具体访问、调查对象和报告交付，达到中等国际监督服务量级；证据和建议是否被采纳不作为M自动增益。
attribution rationaleTheo van Boven .20; OHCHR Special Procedures staff .27; Spanish judicial, oversight, and government interlocutors .18; Civil society organizations and interviewed informants .13; Anti-torture oversight and international law antecedents .13; Unresolved share .09. Shares are revisable research judgments.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
特奥·范博芬 .20；OHCHR特别程序工作人员 .27；西班牙司法、监察与政府交涉方 .18；民间组织与受访信息提供者 .13；反酷刑监督与国际法前史 .13；未解析份额 .09。份额为可修订研究判断。
overlap boundaryOnly counts the investigation, legal analysis, and recommendation delivery from the 2003 visit and 2004 report; does not attribute all of Spain's torture practices, state reforms, or global anti-torture progress to the report's authors.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
只计2003访问及2004报告的调查、法律分析和建议交付；不把西班牙全部酷刑实践、国家改革或全球反酷刑进展归于报告作者。
Evidence gapsOther country missions and implementation of individual recommendations not verified; informant share limited to actively provided information, does not count passive victim status as a contribution.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
其他国别任务和逐项建议落实未核；受访者份额仅限主动提供信息，不把被动受害身份计作贡献
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- .20Theo van BovenOriginal Chinese · 特奥·范博芬Person
- .27OHCHR special-procedures staffOriginal Chinese · OHCHR特别程序工作人员Team
- .18Spanish judicial, oversight, and government interlocutorsOriginal Chinese · 西班牙司法、监察与政府交涉方Team
- .13Civil-society organizations and interviewed information providersOriginal Chinese · 民间组织与受访信息提供者Team
- .13Prehistory of anti-torture monitoring and international lawOriginal Chinese · 反酷刑监督与国际法前史Predecessor pool
- .09Unresolved shareOriginal Chinese · 未解析份额Unallocated
Source links
- UN primary reports and institutional archives ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国原报告与机构档案
BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED
Not included in this score
These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.
Work as Director of the UN Human Rights Division
联合国人权司主任时期工作
Reason Only personal-archive and assistant leads are available; the office is insufficient to establish specific institutional delivery.
Original Chinese reason
只有个人档案与助理线索，职位不足以证明具体制度交付。
Other anti-torture country missions
其他反酷刑国别任务
Reason The OHCHR index establishes that 2005 follow-up reports concerned Azerbaijan, Chile, Mexico, Russia, Spain, Turkey, and Uzbekistan; because the full texts failed to open, original visit responsibility, recommendations, and consequences cannot yet be distinguished for each country. One Spain item does not represent the whole tenure.
Original Chinese reason
OHCHR索引明确2005后续报告涉及阿塞拜疆、智利、墨西哥、俄罗斯、西班牙、土耳其、乌兹别克斯坦；正文打开失败，尚不能分辨各国的原访问责任、建议和后果。西班牙一项不代表整个任期。
Post-2005 UN reparations-principles work
2005联合国赔偿原则后续
Reason The 1993 report is already included as an input; subsequent revisions, Bassiouni, and UN adoption are not fed back.
Original Chinese reason
1993报告作为输入已计；后续修订、Bassiouni与联合国采用不回灌。
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →