Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Sergei Korolev
Recorded name: 谢尔盖·科罗廖夫
Sergei Korolev was a Soviet rocket engineer and chief designer who participated in engineering organization from early liquid rockets through Sputnik and Vostok.
Original Chinese introduction
谢尔盖·科罗廖夫是苏联火箭工程师和总设计师，参与从早期液体火箭到Sputnik和Vostok的工程组织。
The R-7 rocket platform, the Sputnik One satellite, and the Vostok crewed spacecraft were representative projects that he led. These engineering efforts organized propulsion, control, communications, and ground support into space systems capable of carrying out missions.
Original Chinese context
R-7火箭平台、斯普特尼克一号卫星以及东方号载人飞船，是他主持的代表项目。这些工程把推进、控制、通信和地面保障组织成能够执行任务的航天系统。
Introduction sources
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
6 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This round currently lists 6 limited research accounts; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered material and negative effects not yet established are not treated as zero; specific gaps are detailed item by item.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列6项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
6 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01Sputnik 1 orbital satellite system deliverySputnik 1轨道卫星系统交付OUT-SL0123-1957-SPUTNIK-ONE-ORBITAL-SATELLITE · 1957 | 6.5 | 13% | 231.046323 | 4.73 | 23.1409% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 02Vostok/Voskhod early human-spaceflight systemVostok/Voskhod早期载人航天系统OUT-SL0123-1961-1965-VOSTOK-VOSKHOD-HUMAN-SPACEFLIGHT · 1961 | 6.4 | 14% | 221.745047 | 4.70 | 22.2093% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 03R-7 multistage launch-vehicle and intercontinental-missile system engineering deliveryR-7多级运载与洲际导弹系统工程交付OUT-SL0123-1957-R7-LAUNCH-SYSTEM · 1957 | 6.0 | 18% | 179.820000 | 4.51 | 18.0102% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 04Luna and the early engineering family of automated planetary explorationLuna及早期行星自动探测工程族OUT-SL0123-1959-1966-ROBOTIC-LUNAR-PLANETARY-PROBES · 1959 | 6.0 | 14% | 139.860000 | 4.30 | 14.0079% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 05Korolev-period design and development of the modular Soyuz crewed spacecraftSoyuz模块化载人飞船的Korolev时期设计开发OUT-SL0123-1962-1966-SOYUZ-MODULAR-SPACECRAFT-DEVELOPMENT · 1962 | 5.8 | 15% | 118.999235 | 4.16 | 11.9186% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 06The GIRD rocket organization and delivery of early liquid rockets and rocket glidersGIRD火箭组织与早期液体火箭、火箭滑翔机交付OUT-SL0123-1931-1940-GIRD-EARLY-ROCKET-ENGINEERING · 1931 | 5.3 | 24% | 106.964062 | 4.07 | 10.7132% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
01Sputnik 1 orbital satellite system deliverySputnik 1轨道卫星系统交付OUT-SL0123-1957-SPUTNIK-ONE-ORBITAL-SATELLITE
Record year1957
summaryIt turned the satellite concept into a working system actually placed in orbit, with signals receivable worldwide. The 1957 Sputnik 1 integrated a minimal satellite, radio, power supply, orbit, and launch; the general launch value of R-7 has been consumed at the R-7 item, and this item counts only the first sustained orbital signal and satellite delivery.
Original Chinese · summary
把卫星设想转化为实际入轨、可被全球接收的工作系统。 1957年Sputnik 1的最小卫星、无线电、电源、轨道和发射整合；R-7通用运载价值已在R-7点消费，本点只计首次持续轨道信号与卫星交付。
M rationaleNASA project history gives specific core members, reports, radio, and battery teams; M6.5 is assigned for the outcome of the first working orbital satellite.
Original Chinese · M rationale
NASA项目史给出具体核心成员、报告、无线电和电池团队，按首次工作轨道卫星终态取M6.5。
attribution rationaleKorolev 0.13, Tikhonravov 0.16, Glushko 0.11, Keldysh 0.09, teams 0.28, prior work 0.07, institutions 0.05, unresolved 0.11.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Korolev0.13，Tikhonravov0.16，Glushko0.11，Keldysh0.09，团队0.28，前史0.07，机构0.05，未解析0.11。
overlap boundaryThe 1957 Sputnik 1 integrated a minimal satellite, radio, power supply, orbit, and launch; the general launch value of R-7 has been consumed at the R-7 item, and this item counts only the first sustained orbital signal and satellite delivery.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1957年Sputnik 1的最小卫星、无线电、电源、轨道和发射整合；R-7通用运载价值已在R-7点消费，本点只计首次持续轨道信号与卫星交付。
Evidence gapsRadio, battery, structure, and orbital roles within the core teams still need archival-level share calibration.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
核心团队内无线电、电池、结构和轨道岗位尚需档案级份额校准。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.13Sergei KorolevOriginal Chinese · 谢尔盖·科罗廖夫Person
- 0.16MIKHAIL TIKHONRAVOV (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · MIKHAIL TIKHONRAVOV（预算列明角色）Person
- 0.11Valentin GlushkoOriginal Chinese · 瓦连京·格鲁什科Person
- 0.09Mstislav KeldyshOriginal Chinese · 姆斯季斯拉夫·克尔德什Person
- 0.28SPUTNIK DESIGN RADIO BATTERY AND LAUNCH TEAMS (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · SPUTNIK DESIGN RADIO BATTERY AND LAUNCH TEAMS（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.07EARLY SATELLITE AND ORBITAL SCIENCE PRIOR WORK (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · EARLY SATELLITE AND ORBITAL SCIENCE PREHISTORY（预算列明角色）Predecessor pool
- 0.05SOVIET ACADEMIC AND SPACE INSTITUTIONS (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · SOVIET ACADEMIC AND SPACE INSTITUTIONS（预算列明角色）Institution
- 0.11UNRESOLVED SPUTNIK ATTRIBUTION (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · UNRESOLVED SPUTNIK ATTRIBUTION（预算列明角色）Unallocated
02Vostok/Voskhod early human-spaceflight systemVostok/Voskhod早期载人航天系统OUT-SL0123-1961-1965-VOSTOK-VOSKHOD-HUMAN-SPACEFLIGHT
Record year1961
summaryIt formed a working system for putting people into orbit, life support, return, and ground operations, and extended it to multiple occupants and extravehicular activity. The system family covers Vostok's first human orbital flight and the early Voskhod systems for multiple occupants and extravehicular activity; M is not repeated for every flight, nor is the general value of the R-7 platform duplicated.
Original Chinese · summary
形成可载人入轨、生命保障、返回和地面运行的工作系统，并扩展到多人及舱外活动。 Vostok首次载人轨道飞行及Voskhod多人/舱外活动前期系统族；不按每次飞行重复M，不重复R-7平台通用价值。
M rationaleM6.4 is assigned for the civilizational technical scope of the first human orbital system and its early extensions.
Original Chinese · M rationale
按首次载人轨道系统和早期扩展的文明技术范围取M6.4。
attribution rationaleKorolev 0.14, cosmonaut teams 0.13, engineering medical operations teams 0.42, prior work 0.10, institutions 0.08, unresolved 0.13.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Korolev0.14，宇航员团队0.13，工程医疗运行团队0.42，前史0.10，机构0.08，未解析0.13。
overlap boundaryThe system family covers Vostok's first human orbital flight and the early Voskhod systems for multiple occupants and extravehicular activity; M is not repeated for every flight, nor is the general value of the R-7 platform duplicated.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
Vostok首次载人轨道飞行及Voskhod多人/舱外活动前期系统族；不按每次飞行重复M，不重复R-7平台通用价值。
Evidence gapsVoskhod safety compromises, animal-experiment programs, and responsibility for specific subsystems require further primary archives.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
Voskhod安全妥协、试验动物项目和具体子系统责任需进一步原始档案。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.14Sergei KorolevOriginal Chinese · 谢尔盖·科罗廖夫Person
- 0.13YURI GAGARIN AND EARLY COSMONAUTS (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · YURI GAGARIN AND EARLY COSMONAUTS（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.42VOSTOK VOSKHOD DESIGN MEDICAL TRACKING AND LAUNCH TEAMS (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · VOSTOK VOSKHOD DESIGN MEDICAL TRACKING AND LAUNCH TEAMS（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.1R7 AND UNCREWED SPACECRAFT PRIOR WORK (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · R7 AND UNCREWED SPACECRAFT PREHISTORY（预算列明角色）Predecessor pool
- 0.08SOVIET SPACE AND MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · SOVIET SPACE AND MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS（预算列明角色）Institution
- 0.13UNRESOLVED HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT ATTRIBUTION (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · UNRESOLVED HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT ATTRIBUTION（预算列明角色）Unallocated
Source links
03R-7 multistage launch-vehicle and intercontinental-missile system engineering deliveryR-7多级运载与洲际导弹系统工程交付OUT-SL0123-1957-R7-LAUNCH-SYSTEM
Record year1957
summaryIt formed an operational integration of a high-thrust multi-engine cluster, multistage system, and launch infrastructure, sufficient to support intercontinental ballistic and orbital launches. R-7 was a multistage long-range rocket/launch-vehicle platform actually tested and usable around 1957; the respective mission outcomes of Sputnik, Luna, and Vostok are not duplicated in this item.
Original Chinese · summary
形成高推力多发动机簇、多级系统与发射基础设施的可运行整合，足以承担洲际弹道与轨道发射。 R-7作为1957年前后实际试验和可用的多级远程火箭/运载器平台；不把Sputnik、Luna和Vostok各自的任务终态重复计入本点。
M rationaleM6.0 is assigned for the dual-use outcome of an operational heavy multistage launch platform and intercontinental weapons system; military contracts themselves are not counted as a positive contribution.
Original Chinese · M rationale
按可运行重型多级运载平台与洲际武器系统的双重用途终态取M6.0，未把军事合同本身当正贡献。
attribution rationaleKorolev0.18, Glushko0.14, Tikhonravov0.08, engineering teams0.37, prior work0.09, institutions0.06, unresolved0.08.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Korolev0.18，Glushko0.14，Tikhonravov0.08，工程团队0.37，前史0.09，机构0.06，未解析0.08。
overlap boundaryR-7 as a multistage long-range rocket/launch-vehicle platform actually tested and usable around 1957; the separate mission outcomes of Sputnik, Luna, and Vostok are not counted again in this item.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
R-7作为1957年前后实际试验和可用的多级远程火箭/运载器平台；不把Sputnik、Luna和Vostok各自的任务终态重复计入本点。
Evidence gapsThe net assessment of military deployment, deterrence, and accident consequences has not been closed; no separate net formula is invented.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
军用部署、威慑与事故后果的净评价未闭合；不另造净算式。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.18Sergei KorolevOriginal Chinese · 谢尔盖·科罗廖夫Person
- 0.14Valentin GlushkoOriginal Chinese · 瓦连京·格鲁什科Person
- 0.08MIKHAIL TIKHONRAVOV (role specified in attribution budget)Original Chinese · MIKHAIL TIKHONRAVOV（预算列明角色）Person
- 0.37R7 DESIGN MANUFACTURING AND TEST TEAMS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · R7 DESIGN MANUFACTURING AND TEST TEAMS（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.09EARLY MULTISTAGE AND BALLISTIC ROCKETRY (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · EARLY MULTISTAGE AND BALLISTIC ROCKETRY（预算列明角色）Predecessor pool
- 0.06SOVIET DEFENSE AND LAUNCH INSTITUTIONS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · SOVIET DEFENSE AND LAUNCH INSTITUTIONS（预算列明角色）Institution
- 0.08UNRESOLVED R7 ATTRIBUTION (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · UNRESOLVED R7 ATTRIBUTION（预算列明角色）Unallocated
Source links
04Luna and the early engineering family of automated planetary explorationLuna及早期行星自动探测工程族OUT-SL0123-1959-1966-ROBOTIC-LUNAR-PLANETARY-PROBES
Record year1959
summaryIt extended orbital-satellite capability into automated missions for deep-space communication, navigation, imaging, and lunar/planetary targets. Luna 1/2/3 and other first lunar flybys, impacts, and far-side imaging, together with early automated Venus/Mars exploration engineering in the Korolev period, are combined as one family of automated exploration missions; M is not duplicated by probe number.
Original Chinese · summary
把轨道卫星能力扩展为深空通信、导航、成像与月球/行星目标的自动任务。 Luna 1/2/3等首次月球飞越、撞击与远侧成像，以及Korolev时期早期金星/火星自动探测工程；合为自动探测任务族，不按探测器编号复制M。
M rationaleM6.0 is assigned for the shared deep-space mission capability of several actual automated-exploration outcomes; failed missions receive no credit for investment or number.
Original Chinese · M rationale
按多种实际自动探测终态的共同深空任务能力取M6.0；失败任务不以投入或数量加分。
attribution rationaleKorolev0.14, Keldysh0.10, engineering and operations teams0.39, scientific-instrument teams0.12, prior work0.08, institutions0.07, unresolved0.10.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Korolev0.14，Keldysh0.10，工程运行团队0.39，科学仪器团队0.12，前史0.08，机构0.07，未解析0.10。
overlap boundaryLuna 1/2/3 and other first lunar flybys, impacts, and far-side imaging, together with early automated Venus/Mars exploration engineering in the Korolev period, are combined as one family of automated exploration missions; M is not duplicated by probe number.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
Luna 1/2/3等首次月球飞越、撞击与远侧成像，以及Korolev时期早期金星/火星自动探测工程；合为自动探测任务族，不按探测器编号复制M。
Evidence gapsThe success/failure boundaries of individual probes, instrument leads, and Keldysh's specific mission shares still require project archives.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
各探测器成功与失败边界、仪器负责人及Keldysh的具体任务份额仍需项目档案。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.14Sergei KorolevOriginal Chinese · 谢尔盖·科罗廖夫Person
- 0.1Mstislav KeldyshOriginal Chinese · 姆斯季斯拉夫·克尔德什Person
- 0.39OKB1 ROBOTIC PROBE ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · OKB1 ROBOTIC PROBE ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.12SOVIET SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT TEAMS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · SOVIET SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT TEAMS（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.08EARLY ROCKET AND PLANETARY SCIENCE PREHISTORY (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · EARLY ROCKET AND PLANETARY SCIENCE PREHISTORY（预算列明角色）Predecessor pool
- 0.07SOVIET ACADEMY AND LAUNCH INSTITUTIONS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · SOVIET ACADEMY AND LAUNCH INSTITUTIONS（预算列明角色）Institution
- 0.1UNRESOLVED SOVIET PROBE ATTRIBUTION (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · UNRESOLVED SOVIET PROBE ATTRIBUTION（预算列明角色）Unallocated
Source links
05Korolev-period design and development of the modular Soyuz crewed spacecraftSoyuz模块化载人飞船的Korolev时期设计开发OUT-SL0123-1962-1966-SOYUZ-MODULAR-SPACECRAFT-DEVELOPMENT
Record year1962
summaryIt advanced a single early spacecraft into a longer-term modular mission architecture comprising an orbital module, reentry module, and service module. This covers the overall modular Soyuz spacecraft scheme and early development during Korolev's lifetime, plus the necessary share of direct successor teams in completing the initial system; decades of later variants and ISS service are not fed back into the account.
Original Chinese · summary
将单次早期飞船推进为含轨道舱、返回舱和服务舱的较长期模块化任务架构。 Korolev在世期间Soyuz模块化飞船总体方案和早期开发，以及直接后继团队完成初代系统的必要份额；不把数十年改型和ISS服务回灌。
M rationaleM5.8 is assigned for the modular-spacecraft engineering outcome formed and in development during his lifetime and completed by the direct team.
Original Chinese · M rationale
按在世期间已形成并进入开发、由直接团队完成的模块化飞船工程终态取M5.8。
attribution rationaleKorolev0.15, design and test teams0.45, prior work0.12, institutions0.07, successor completion teams0.12, unresolved0.09.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Korolev0.15，设计试验团队0.45，前史0.12，机构0.07，后继完成团队0.12，未解析0.09。
overlap boundaryThe overall modular Soyuz spacecraft scheme and early development during Korolev's lifetime, plus the necessary share of direct successor teams in completing the initial system; decades of later variants and ISS service are not fed back into the account.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
Korolev在世期间Soyuz模块化飞船总体方案和早期开发，以及直接后继团队完成初代系统的必要份额；不把数十年改型和ISS服务回灌。
Evidence gapsThe design maturity at Korolev's death, the responsibility chain for the Soyuz 1 accident, and subsequent modifications still require engineering archives.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
Korolev去世时设计成熟度、Soyuz 1事故责任链与后继修改尚需工程档案。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.15Sergei KorolevOriginal Chinese · 谢尔盖·科罗廖夫Person
- 0.45OKB1 SOYUZ DESIGN AND TEST TEAM (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · OKB1 SOYUZ DESIGN AND TEST TEAM（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.12VOSTOK AND RENDEZVOUS SPACECRAFT PREHISTORY (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · VOSTOK AND RENDEZVOUS SPACECRAFT PREHISTORY（预算列明角色）Predecessor pool
- 0.07SOVIET SPACE INSTITUTIONS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · SOVIET SPACE INSTITUTIONS（预算列明角色）Institution
- 0.12POST KOROLEV SOYUZ COMPLETION TEAM (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · POST KOROLEV SOYUZ COMPLETION TEAM（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.09UNRESOLVED SOYUZ ATTRIBUTION (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · UNRESOLVED SOYUZ ATTRIBUTION（预算列明角色）Unallocated
Source links
06The GIRD rocket organization and delivery of early liquid rockets and rocket glidersGIRD火箭组织与早期液体火箭、火箭滑翔机交付OUT-SL0123-1931-1940-GIRD-EARLY-ROCKET-ENGINEERING
Record year1931
summaryIt turned dispersed interests into manufacturing and test teams, producing operational indigenous Soviet early liquid rockets and rocket gliders. This covers the GIRD organization around 1931–1940, GIRD-09/10 liquid rockets, and early engineering outcomes such as the RP-318 rocket glider; it excludes the later R-7, satellites, and crewed spaceflight.
Original Chinese · summary
把分散兴趣组织成制造与试验团队，并形成苏联本土可运行的早期液体火箭和火箭滑翔机交付。 1931–1940年前后的GIRD组织、GIRD-09/10液体火箭及RP-318火箭滑翔机一类早期工程终态；不含后来的R-7、卫星和载人航天。
M rationaleOfficial biographies clearly identify the co-founding of GIRD and specific early models; M5.3 is assigned for early operational rocket engineering and organizational methods.
Original Chinese · M rationale
官方传记明确GIRD共同创立与具体早期型号；按早期可运行火箭工程及组织方法取M5.3。
attribution rationaleKorolev0.24, Zander0.18, GIRD teams0.31, rocket prior work0.14, institutions0.05, unresolved0.08.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Korolev0.24，Zander0.18，GIRD团队0.31，火箭前史0.14，机构0.05，未解析0.08。
overlap boundaryThe GIRD organization around 1931–1940, GIRD-09/10 liquid rockets, and early engineering outcomes such as the RP-318 rocket glider; it excludes the later R-7, satellites, and crewed spaceflight.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1931–1940年前后的GIRD组织、GIRD-09/10液体火箭及RP-318火箭滑翔机一类早期工程终态；不含后来的R-7、卫星和载人航天。
Evidence gapsThe person-by-person division of work in GIRD engine designs and RP-318 flight tests still requires archival refinement.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
GIRD各发动机设计、RP-318飞行试验的逐人分工仍需档案细化。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.24Sergei KorolevOriginal Chinese · 谢尔盖·科罗廖夫Person
- 0.18FRIEDRICH ZANDER (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · FRIEDRICH ZANDER（预算列明角色）Person
- 0.31GIRD ENGINEERS AND TEST CREWS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · GIRD ENGINEERS AND TEST CREWS（预算列明角色）Team
- 0.14TSIOLKOVSKY GODDARD OBERTH AND EARLY ROCKETRY (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · TSIOLKOVSKY GODDARD OBERTH AND EARLY ROCKETRY（预算列明角色）Predecessor pool
- 0.05SOVIET EARLY ROCKET INSTITUTIONS (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · SOVIET EARLY ROCKET INSTITUTIONS（预算列明角色）Institution
- 0.08UNRESOLVED GIRD ATTRIBUTION (role listed in the attribution budget)Original Chinese · UNRESOLVED GIRD ATTRIBUTION（预算列明角色）Unallocated
Source links
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →