PERSON · STARLIGHT

Mario Molina

Recorded name: 马里奥·莫利纳

Mario Molina was a Mexican chemist and atmospheric scientist.

Original Chinese introduction

马里奥·莫利纳是墨西哥化学家和大气科学家。

He and his collaborators studied reactions of chlorine-containing compounds in the stratosphere and their effects on ozone.

Original Chinese context

他与合作者研究含氯化合物在平流层中的反应及其对臭氧的影响。

Introduction sources
Provisional score5.96

Displayed to two decimal places.

Score tierNova T5

Derived from the current score.

Evaluated contributions4

Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.

ASSESSMENT SCOPE

What this score covers

All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.

Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.

4 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.

Original scope note

This research record currently includes 4 outcomes within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.

Original Chinese scope

本轮当前已列4项有限研究账;M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理,具体缺口见逐项说明。

Open Chinese score details →

Download the full score details (JSON, Chinese notes)

CALCULATION

How the score is calculated

Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).

M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.

See a simple scoring example →

SCORE DETAILS

4 evaluated contributions

M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.

Chinese score details →

Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.

OutcomeMAttribution shareAttributed lightStandalone scoreShare of totalStatus
01CFC photolysis and the chlorine-catalyzed ozone-depletion mechanismCFC光解与氯催化臭氧损耗机制OUT-SL0468-1974-CFC-CHLORINE-CATALYSED-OZONE-DEPLETION-MECHANISM · 19746.531%550.9566175.4857.9241%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
02Experimental validation of chlorine-activation reactions on polar ice-particle surfaces极地冰粒表面氯活化反应的实验验证OUT-SL0468-1986-1988-POLAR-ICE-HETEROGENEOUS-CHLORINE-CHEMISTRY · 19866.123%257.8342444.8327.1071%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
03Mexico City integrated air-quality assessment and policy plan墨西哥城空气质量综合评估与政策方案OUT-SL0468-2000-2004-MEXICO-CITY-INTEGRATED-AIR-QUALITY-ASSESSMENT · 20005.810%79.3328233.818.3406%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
04Cross-scientific, policy, and media communication of CFC–ozone riskCFC—臭氧风险的跨科学、政策与媒体沟通OUT-SL0468-1974-1980S-CFC-OZONE-RISK-COMMUNICATION · 19745.020%63.0455533.616.6282%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence

On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.

NOTES AND SOURCES

Contribution notes and source links

English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.

01CFC photolysis and the chlorine-catalyzed ozone-depletion mechanismCFC光解与氯催化臭氧损耗机制OUT-SL0468-1974-CFC-CHLORINE-CATALYSED-OZONE-DEPLETION-MECHANISM

Record year1974

summaryCFC photolysis and the chlorine-catalyzed ozone-depletion mechanism. 1974 coauthorship, CFC lifetimes of 40–150 years, photolytic chlorine production, and catalytic ozone destruction.

Original Chinese · summary

CFC光解与氯催化臭氧损耗机制。1974共同署名、CFC 40–150年寿命、光解产氯及臭氧催化破坏。

M rationaleThe Nature original abstract directly supports the mechanism, lifetime, and coauthorship; Nobel materials only check the shared field. Take M6.5 for a mechanism that changed understanding of global atmospheric-chemistry risk.

Original Chinese · M rationale

Nature原文摘要直接支持机制、寿命和共同署名,诺奖资料仅核共同领域;按改变全球大气化学风险理解的机制取M6.5。

attribution rationaleMolina 0.31, Rowland 0.31, Crutzen 0.08, other scientific prior tradition 0.12, laboratory support 0.07, UCI 0.04, unresolved 0.07.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Molina0.31,Rowland0.31,Crutzen0.08,其他科学前史0.12,实验室支持0.07,UCI0.04,未解析0.07。

overlap boundaryThe coauthored 1974 Nature article proposed long CFC persistence, stratospheric photolysis producing chlorine atoms, and catalytic ozone destruction; it does not claim Crutzen’s independent NOx work, the 1985 ozone-hole discovery, subsequent heterogeneous chemistry, or benefits of global agreements.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1974 Nature共同论文提出CFC长期存留、平流层光解产生氯原子并催化破坏臭氧;不领取Crutzen独立NOx工作、1985臭氧洞发现、后续异相化学或全球协议收益。

Evidence gapsNo laboratory notebooks document the article’s specific calculations or the internal division of work between Rowland and Molina; shares of CFC-emissions data and early observational sources still await a citation chain.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

论文具体计算与Rowland/Molina内部工作分工未有实验笔记。;CFC排放数据和早期观测来源份额仍待引用链。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.31Mario MolinaOriginal Chinese · 马里奥·莫利纳Person
  • 0.31Frank Sherwood RowlandOriginal Chinese · 弗兰克·舍伍德·罗兰Person
  • 0.08Paul CrutzenOriginal Chinese · 保罗·克鲁岑Person
  • 0.12Prior tradition of ozone photochemistry, CFC properties, and atmospheric observationsOriginal Chinese · 臭氧光化学、CFC性质与大气观测前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.07Calculation, discussion, and research-environment teamOriginal Chinese · 计算、讨论和研究环境团队Team
  • 0.04University of California, IrvineOriginal Chinese · 加州大学欧文分校Institution
  • 0.07Unresolved contributions to calculations, materials, and unnamed discussionOriginal Chinese · 未解析的计算、资料和未具名讨论贡献Unallocated

Source links

02Experimental validation of chlorine-activation reactions on polar ice-particle surfaces极地冰粒表面氯活化反应的实验验证OUT-SL0468-1986-1988-POLAR-ICE-HETEROGENEOUS-CHLORINE-CHEMISTRY

Record year1986

summaryExperimental validation of chlorine-activation reactions on polar ice-particle surfaces. A JPL team demonstrated reactions on ice in the laboratory, with four authors and comparison with 1987 observations.

Original Chinese · summary

极地冰粒表面氯活化反应的实验验证。JPL团队在实验室证明冰上反应、四位作者及与1987观测比较。

M rationaleA contemporaneous JPL report and Molina’s Nobel lecture explicitly identify the four-person experiment, Solomon’s precursor role, and subsequent independent replication; take M6.1 for key experimental validation of a mechanism.

Original Chinese · M rationale

JPL同期报道和Molina诺奖讲演明确四人实验、Solomon前驱及后续独立重复;按关键机制实验验证取M6.1。

attribution rationaleMolina 0.23, Tso 0.14, Luisa Molina 0.14, Wang 0.14, Solomon 0.08, PSC prior tradition 0.04, JPL team 0.10, other prior tradition 0.08, JPL 0.03, unresolved 0.02.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Molina0.23,Tso0.14,Luisa Molina0.14,Wang0.14,Solomon0.08,PSC前史0.04,JPL团队0.10,其他前史0.08,JPL0.03,未解析0.02。

overlap boundaryIce-particle-surface chlorine-activation experiments explaining polar ozone loss in 1986–1988, centered on the 1987 four-author Science article; it does not claim discovery of the ozone hole, Solomon’s earlier PSC hypothesis, or the full mechanism of polar ozone.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1986–1988解释极地臭氧损耗的冰粒表面氯活化实验,核心为1987四作者Science论文;不领取臭氧洞发现、Solomon先行PSC假说或极地臭氧完整机制。

Evidence gapsLaboratory records have not been read for the four authors’ specific division of experimental design, instrumentation, and analysis.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

四位作者的实验设计、仪器和分析具体分工未读实验记录。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.23Mario MolinaOriginal Chinese · 马里奥·莫利纳Person
  • 0.14Tai-Ly TsoPerson
  • 0.14Luisa T. MolinaPerson
  • 0.14Frank C. Y. WangPerson
  • 0.08Susan SolomonOriginal Chinese · 苏珊·索罗门Person
  • 0.04Other prior tradition in PSC physical chemistry and the polar-reaction frameworkOriginal Chinese · PSC物理化学与极地反应框架的其他前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.1Experimental apparatus, technical, and observational-comparison teamOriginal Chinese · 实验设备、技术与观测比较团队Team
  • 0.08Prior tradition of ozone-hole discovery and the surface-chemistry baselineOriginal Chinese · 臭氧洞发现及表面化学基线前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.03Jet Propulsion LaboratoryOriginal Chinese · 喷气推进实验室Institution
  • 0.02Unresolved internal experimental contributionsOriginal Chinese · 未解析的实验内部贡献Unallocated

Source links

03Mexico City integrated air-quality assessment and policy plan墨西哥城空气质量综合评估与政策方案OUT-SL0468-2000-2004-MEXICO-CITY-INTEGRATED-AIR-QUALITY-ASSESSMENT

Record year2000

summaryMexico City integrated air-quality assessment and policy plan. Submitted a 2001–2010 integrated strategy to government, industry, and academia, with Mario and Luisa and an interdisciplinary team collaborating.

Original Chinese · summary

墨西哥城空气质量综合评估与政策方案。向政府/产业/学界提交2001–2010综合战略,Mario与Luisa及跨学科团队合作。

M rationaleAn MIT report establishes the final report and Mario/Luisa with a multinational team; a Mexico City official PDF establishes coordination by the two and government commissioning. Take M5.8 for a delivered integrated assessment.

Original Chinese · M rationale

MIT报道可证最终报告、Mario/Luisa与多国团队,墨西哥城官方PDF可证二人协调及政府委托;按已交付综合评估取M5.8。

attribution rationaleMario Molina 0.10, Luisa Molina 0.14, interdisciplinary team 0.34, government institutions 0.16, research institutions 0.12, prior tradition 0.09, unresolved 0.05.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Mario Molina0.10,Luisa Molina0.14,跨学科团队0.34,政府机构0.16,研究机构0.12,前史0.09,未解析0.05。

overlap boundaryMexico City’s integrated air-quality strategy in 2000–2004 for 2001–2010, the 2002 integrated-assessment work, and preparation for second-phase implementation; counts only interdisciplinary assessment and concrete reports, not government policy, emissions changes, or health outcomes.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

2000–2004墨西哥城2001–2010空气质量综合战略、2002综合评估著作及第二阶段实施准备;只计跨学科评估和具体报告,不领取政府政策、排放变化或健康结果。

Evidence gapsAuthors of each report chapter, model data, and the policy-adoption chain have not been analyzed item by item; actual emissions, exposure, and health outcomes do not enter this point assessment.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

报告各章节作者、模型数据与政策采纳链未逐项解析。;实际排放、暴露和健康结果不进入本点评估。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.1Mario MolinaOriginal Chinese · 马里奥·莫利纳Person
  • 0.14Luisa T. MolinaPerson
  • 0.34Mexico–US air-quality, health, and socioeconomic research teamOriginal Chinese · 墨美空气质量、健康与社会经济研究团队Team
  • 0.16Mexico City Environmental Commission and government institutionsOriginal Chinese · 墨西哥城环境委员会与政府机构Institution
  • 0.12MIT, Harvard, and Mexican research institutionsOriginal Chinese · MIT、哈佛与墨西哥研究机构Institution
  • 0.09Prior tradition of emissions inventories, monitoring, cost-benefit analysis, and integrated assessmentOriginal Chinese · 排放清单、监测、成本效益与综合评估前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.05Unresolved contributions to chapters, models, and policy recommendationsOriginal Chinese · 未解析的章节、模型和政策建议贡献Unallocated

Source links

04Cross-scientific, policy, and media communication of CFC–ozone riskCFC—臭氧风险的跨科学、政策与媒体沟通OUT-SL0468-1974-1980S-CFC-OZONE-RISK-COMMUNICATION

Record year1974

summaryCross-scientific, policy, and media communication of CFC–ozone risk. After the article, the two decided to communicate the risk to scientists, policymakers, and news media.

Original Chinese · summary

CFC—臭氧风险的跨科学、政策与媒体沟通。论文后两人决定向科学家、政策制定者和新闻媒体传达风险。

M rationaleA UC page cites Molina’s own account that the two article authors decided after publication to communicate with three types of audience; there was actual public service, but records of each hearing/assessment are currently absent, so take M5.0 for a bounded communication residual.

Original Chinese · M rationale

UC页面引Molina自述两位作者发表后决定向三类受众沟通;有实际公共服务,但当前缺逐次听证/评估记录,按有界沟通残余取M5.0。

attribution rationaleMolina 0.20, Rowland 0.20, assessment-science community 0.18, policy personnel 0.13, media 0.10, prior tradition 0.08, institutions 0.04, unresolved 0.07.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Molina0.20,Rowland0.20,评估科学共同体0.18,政策人员0.13,媒体0.10,前史0.08,机构0.04,未解析0.07。

overlap boundaryAfter the 1974 article, public knowledge service by Molina and Rowland continuously communicating CFC–ozone risk to other scientists, policymakers, and media; counts only the residual of scientific explanation and agenda setting, not regulation making, the Montreal Protocol, corporate substitution, or ozone recovery.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1974论文后Molina与Rowland把CFC—臭氧风险持续传达给其他科学家、政策制定者和媒体的公共知识服务;只计科学解释与议程设置残余,不领取法规制定、Montreal Protocol、企业替代或臭氧恢复。

Evidence gapsRecords are lacking for each hearing, technical assessment, media text, and the Rowland/Molina division of work.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

缺逐次听证、技术评估、媒体文本和Rowland/Molina分工。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.2Mario MolinaOriginal Chinese · 马里奥·莫利纳Person
  • 0.2Frank Sherwood RowlandOriginal Chinese · 弗兰克·舍伍德·罗兰Person
  • 0.18Atmospheric-science assessment and observation communityOriginal Chinese · 大气科学评估与观测共同体Team
  • 0.13Environmental-policy assessment, regulatory, and negotiation personnelOriginal Chinese · 环境政策评估、监管与谈判人员Team
  • 0.1Science journalists and public-communication teamOriginal Chinese · 科学记者与公众传播团队Team
  • 0.08Prior tradition of risk communication and environmental governanceOriginal Chinese · 风险沟通和环境治理前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.04Universities and scientific institutionsOriginal Chinese · 大学与科学机构Institution
  • 0.07Unresolved specific contributions in hearings, media, and assessment stagesOriginal Chinese · 未解析的听证、媒体和评估环节的具体贡献Unallocated

Source links

BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED

Not included in this score

These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.

Unimplemented policies and subsequent attribution

尚未落实的政策与后续归功

Reason Policy implementation, subsequent adoption, and the specific shares of each participant are not individually established in the existing material.

Original Chinese reason

政策实施、后世采用及各参与者的具体份额不在现有材料中逐项确证。

Individual attribution for global ozone recovery

全球臭氧恢复的单人归属

Reason Scientific research, international negotiation, policy implementation, and industrial substitution jointly affect ozone-layer protection and cannot be attributed to one person alone.

Original Chinese reason

科学研究、国际谈判、政策执行和产业替代共同影响臭氧层保护,不能单独归于一人。