Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Ralph Bunche
Recorded name: 拉尔夫·本奇
Ralph Bunche was an American political scientist and diplomat who studied colonial governance, participated in early UN trusteeship work, and led the 1949 armistice negotiations.
Original Chinese introduction
拉尔夫·本奇是美国政治学者与外交官，研究殖民治理，参与联合国早期托管制度工作，并主持1949年停战谈判。
Ralph Bunche was an American political scientist and diplomat who studied colonial governance, participated in early UN trusteeship work, and led the 1949 armistice negotiations. He later participated in several peacekeeping operations; his research, mediation, and international-organizational work have distinct outcome and controversy boundaries.
Original Chinese context
拉尔夫·本奇是美国政治学者与外交官，研究殖民治理，参与联合国早期托管制度工作，并主持1949年停战谈判。他后来参与多项维和行动，其研究、调停和国际组织工作具有不同的成果与争议边界。
Introduction sources
- Official Nobel biography ↗Original Chinese label · 诺贝尔奖官方传记
- U.S. diplomacy museum profile ↗Original Chinese label · 美国外交博物馆人物档案
- United Nations memorial materials ↗Original Chinese label · 联合国纪念资料
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
2 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This research record currently includes 2 outcomes within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列2项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
2 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 011949 Armistice Agreement mediation service1949年停战协定调停服务OUT-SL1160-1948-1949-PALESTINE-ARMISTICE-MEDIATION · 1948–1949 | 5.8 | 22% | 174.532212 | 4.49 | 52.5468% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 02Comparative research on colonial governance and decolonization knowledge inputs.殖民治理比较研究与去殖民化知识输入OUT-SL1160-1934-1945-COLONIAL-ADMINISTRATION-RESEARCH · 1934–1945 | 5.0 | 50% | 157.613883 | 4.40 | 47.4532% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
011949 Armistice Agreement mediation service1949年停战协定调停服务OUT-SL1160-1948-1949-PALESTINE-ARMISTICE-MEDIATION
Record year1948–1949
summaryMaintaining negotiations and forming multi-party commitments into a signable cessation of hostilities agreement.
Original Chinese · summary
维持谈判并将多方承诺形成可签署的停止敌对行动协议。
M rationaleThe direct value of halting hostilities is clear and the negotiated end-state is specific, but the territorial and refugee injustices frozen by the agreement compress the overall value.
Original Chinese · M rationale
停止敌对行动的直接价值明确且谈判终态具体，但协议冻结的领土与难民不公压缩整体价值。
attribution rationaleRalph Bunche .22; Folke Bernadotte .07; UN Mediation Secretariat and Technical Team .19; Israeli and Arab Negotiation Delegations .37; Antecedents of Ceasefire and International Mediation .08; Unresolved Share .07. Shares are revisable research judgments.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
拉尔夫·本奇 .22；福尔克·贝尔纳多特 .07；联合国调停秘书处与技术团队 .19；以色列与阿拉伯谈判代表团 .37；停战与国际调停前史 .08；未解析份额 .07。份额为可修订研究判断。
overlap boundaryCounting the individual and team labor that, approximately eleven months after Bernadotte's assassination, continuously mediated to facilitate the 1949 Armistice Agreements; not equivalent to a peaceful resolution, territorial justice, or a solution to the refugee problem.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
计Bernadotte遇刺后约十一月连续调停促成1949停战协议的个人与团队劳动；不等同和平解决、领土公正或难民问题解决。
Evidence gapsAgreement-by-agreement and local consequences have not been audited item-by-item; the division of textual labor between individuals and the Secretariat is unresolved.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
逐份协定和当地后果未逐条审计；个人与秘书处文本分工未闭合
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- .22Ralph BuncheOriginal Chinese · 拉尔夫·本奇Person
- .07Folke BernadotteOriginal Chinese · 福尔克·贝尔纳多特Person
- .19UN mediation secretariat and technical teamsOriginal Chinese · 联合国调停秘书处与技术团队Team
- .37Israeli and Arab negotiating delegationsOriginal Chinese · 以色列与阿拉伯谈判代表团Team
- .08Prehistory of armistice and international mediationOriginal Chinese · 停战与国际调停前史Predecessor pool
- .07Unresolved shareOriginal Chinese · 未解析份额Unallocated
Source links
- Institutional archives and research ↗Original Chinese label · 机构档案与研究
- Institutional archives and research ↗Original Chinese label · 机构档案与研究
02Comparative research on colonial governance and decolonization knowledge inputs.殖民治理比较研究与去殖民化知识输入OUT-SL1160-1934-1945-COLONIAL-ADMINISTRATION-RESEARCH
Record year1934–1945
summaryExamining colonial governance through comparative political research and bringing materials into discussions on international trusteeship and decolonization.
Original Chinese · summary
以比较政治研究检验殖民治理，并把资料带入国际托管与去殖民化讨论。
M rationaleHas independent academic end-states and institutional inputs, but sources remain biased toward biographical accounts; provisionally estimated as moderately important research.
Original Chinese · M rationale
有独立学术终态和制度输入，但来源仍偏人物传记，按中等重要研究暂估。
attribution rationaleRalph Bunche .50; Africa Information, Research and Archive Contributors .17; Colonial Research and Political Science Antecedents .16; Howard University and Research Project Team .08; Unresolved Share .09. Shares are revisable research judgments.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
拉尔夫·本奇 .50；非洲信息、研究与档案贡献者 .17；殖民研究与政治学前史 .16；霍华德大学及研究项目团队 .08；未解析份额 .09。份额为可修订研究判断。
overlap boundaryCount the knowledge input of comparative research on French Togoland/Dahomey and African political analysis for subsequent decolonization work; do not count the operational value of World War II military intelligence.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
计其法属多哥兰/达荷美比较研究及非洲政治分析对后续去殖民化工作的知识输入；不计二战军事情报的作战价值。
Evidence gapsThe original thesis and field materials have not been actually read; the boundary between World War II intelligence and academic research requires archival refinement.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
原论文与田野资料未实读；二战情报和学术研究边界需档案细化
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- .50Ralph BuncheOriginal Chinese · 拉尔夫·本奇Person
- .17African informants, research, and archival contributorsOriginal Chinese · 非洲信息、研究与档案贡献者Team
- .16Prior work in colonial studies and political scienceOriginal Chinese · 殖民研究与政治学前史Predecessor pool
- .08Howard University and research-programme teamsOriginal Chinese · 霍华德大学及研究项目团队Institution
- .09Unresolved shareOriginal Chinese · 未解析份额Unallocated
Source links
- Institutional archives and research ↗Original Chinese label · 机构档案与研究
- Institutional archives and research ↗Original Chinese label · 机构档案与研究
BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED
Not included in this score
These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.
Specific institutional delivery on UN trusteeship and decolonization
联合国托管与去殖民化具体制度交付
Reason The 1945 trusteeship-draft primary text and an archive bibliography for a “Bunche drafting notebook” have been found, supporting participation in text formation; but specific personal passages, rights in trusteeship arrangements, and continuation of colonial governance require review. A positive value cannot be extracted from textual procedure alone; it remains unquantified.
Original Chinese reason
已找到1945托管草案原文及“本奇起草册”档案书目，支持参与文本形成；但个人具体段落、托管安排中的权利与殖民治理延续仍需核查。不能从文本程序中单摘正面价值，暂不量化。
U.S. civil-rights advocacy and Selma participation
美国民权倡议与塞尔玛参与
Reason Public material establishes participation and support, but not an independent major delivery distinct from that of the wider movement participants.
Original Chinese reason
公开资料证实参与和支持，但尚未证明区别于广大运动参与者的独立主要交付。
Organization and leadership of early UN peacekeeping operations
早期联合国维和行动的组织与领导
Reason The institutional organization, military deployments, and direct political consequences of missions including the Congo do not yet have a discernible net scope, so the whole item is deferred and a purely procedural positive score cannot be extracted. The Congo Special Representative role lasted only July–August 1960; visits in 1962–63 do not equal continuous field leadership.
Original Chinese reason
刚果等任务的制度组织、军事部署和直接政治后果尚未形成可辨净边界，整项暂缓，不能从中截取纯程序正分。刚果特别代表只在1960年7–8月任职，1962–63访问不等于连续现场领导。
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →