Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Paul Tillich
Recorded name: 保罗·蒂利希
Paul Tillich was a German-American theologian and philosopher who sought to place modern human problems and theological language in one explanatory framework through concepts such as ontology, symbols, and 'ultimate concern'.
Original Chinese introduction
保罗·蒂利希是德裔美国神学家与哲学家，试图用存在论、象征与“终极关切”等概念，把现代人的问题与神学语言放入同一解释框架。
'Systematic Theology' organizes the issues of existence, reason, and revelation using the 'method of correlation'; 'The Courage to Be' from 1952 transformed anxiety, despair, and self-affirmation into a philosophical argument for the public; his cultural theology then brought this explanatory approach into art, politics, psychology, and inter-religious materials.
Original Chinese context
《系统神学》以“关联方法”组织存在、理性和启示的问题；1952年的《存在的勇气》把焦虑、绝望和自我肯定转为面向公众的哲学论证；他的文化神学又把这种解释方式带入艺术、政治、心理与跨宗教材料。
Introduction sources
- University of Chicago Press: 'Systematic Theology' ↗Original Chinese label · 芝加哥大学出版社：《系统神学》
- Cambridge University Press: An Introduction to the Study of Paul Tillich ↗Original Chinese label · 剑桥大学出版社：Paul Tillich研究导论
- Yale University Press: The Courage to Be ↗Original Chinese label · 耶鲁大学出版社：《存在的勇气》
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
3 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This research record currently includes 3 outcomes within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列3项有限研究账；M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理，具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
3 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01The Correlation Method of 'Systematic Theology' and the Ontological Theological System《系统神学》的关联方法与存在论神学体系OUT-SL2107-1951-1963-SYSTEMATIC-THEOLOGY-CORRELATION-FRAMEWORK · 1951–1963 | 5.7 | 43% | 303.986687 | 4.97 | 44.0735% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 02The Courage to Be: A Public Philosophical Analysis of Anxiety, Nonbeing, and Courage《存在的勇气》对焦虑、非存在与勇气的公共哲学分析OUT-SL2107-1952-COURAGE-TO-BE-EXISTENTIAL-ANALYSIS · 1952 | 5.2 | 50% | 198.553585 | 4.60 | 28.7873% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 03Cultural theology, religious symbolism, and cross-disciplinary dialogue framework文化神学、宗教象征与跨领域对话框架OUT-SL2107-1919-1965-THEOLOGY-OF-CULTURE-INTERPRETIVE-FRAMEWORK · Approximately 1919–1966 | 5.3 | 42% | 187.187109 | 4.55 | 27.1393% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
01The Correlation Method of 'Systematic Theology' and the Ontological Theological System《系统神学》的关联方法与存在论神学体系OUT-SL2107-1951-1963-SYSTEMATIC-THEOLOGY-CORRELATION-FRAMEWORK
Record year1951–1963
summaryPlaces the existential questions of modern people and theological symbols in a systematic correlation of questions and answers, and restates God, revelation, and religious knowledge in ontological language. It covers the correlation method of the three-volume 'Systematic Theology' and its interconnected interpretive system of existence, reason, revelation, the ground of being, and religious symbols; the objective truth of Christian propositions, church institutions, and subsequent theological developments are excluded.
Original Chinese · summary
将现代人的存在问题与神学符号置于成体系的问答关联中，并以存在论语言重述上帝、启示和宗教知识。 三卷《系统神学》的关联方法、存在/理性/启示、存在根基和宗教象征等相互连接的解释体系；基督教命题的客观真值、教会制度和后继神学发展排除。
M rationaleThe three-volume system has broad scope, internal connections, and a mature outcome of long-term discussion; as a humanistic interpretive method, it is assigned M5.7. This value does not claim that religious propositions have been empirically verified.
Original Chinese · M rationale
三卷体系具备大范围、内在连接和长期讨论终态，作为人文解释方法取M5.7；该值不声称宗教命题已经实证。
attribution rationaleTillich 0.43; intellectual antecedents 0.31; editing and academic dialogue 0.08; institutions 0.07; textual community 0.06; unresolved 0.05.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Tillich 0.43；思想前史0.31；编辑与学术对话0.08；机构0.07；文本共同体0.06；未解析0.05。
overlap boundaryThe correlation method of the three-volume 'Systematic Theology', the interconnected interpretive system of existence/reason/revelation, the ground of being, and religious symbols; the objective truth value of Christian propositions, church institutions, and subsequent theological developments are excluded.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
三卷《系统神学》的关联方法、存在/理性/启示、存在根基和宗教象征等相互连接的解释体系；基督教命题的客观真值、教会制度和后继神学发展排除。
Evidence gapsThe original texts of all three volumes and the history of criticism are needed to test the correlation method's consistency and independent contribution across themes.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
需三卷原文与批评史检验关联法在各主题中的一致性和独立增量。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.43Paul TillichOriginal Chinese · 保罗·蒂利希Person
- 0.31Augustine, Luther, Schelling, Heidegger, existentialism, and precursors of systematic theologyOriginal Chinese · 奥古斯丁、路德、谢林、海德格尔、存在主义与系统神学前驱Predecessor pool
- 0.08Editors, translators, and academic interlocutors of Tillich's worksOriginal Chinese · 蒂利希著作的编辑、译者与学术对话者Team
- 0.07University of Chicago Press, divinity schools, and academic institutionsOriginal Chinese · 芝加哥大学出版社、神学院与学术机构Institution
- 0.06Community of biblical, doctrinal, and philosophical textsOriginal Chinese · 圣经、教义与哲学文本共同体Team
- 0.05'Systematic Theology' lectures, editing, and discussion: attribution pool pending verificationOriginal Chinese · 《系统神学》讲座、编辑与讨论归属待核池Unallocated
Source links
- University of Chicago Press: 'Systematic Theology' ↗Original Chinese label · 芝加哥大学出版社：《系统神学》
- Cambridge University Press: An Introduction to the Study of Paul Tillich ↗Original Chinese label · 剑桥大学出版社：Paul Tillich研究导论
02The Courage to Be: A Public Philosophical Analysis of Anxiety, Nonbeing, and Courage《存在的勇气》对焦虑、非存在与勇气的公共哲学分析OUT-SL2107-1952-COURAGE-TO-BE-EXISTENTIAL-ANALYSIS
Record year1952
summaryOrganizes several kinds of existential anxiety into a readable public argument, connecting individual, social, and religious dimensions through courage as 'affirming being in spite of …'. The 1952 'The Courage to Be' offers a philosophical-theological analysis of modern anxiety, despair, nonbeing, and self-affirmation; psychological diagnosis, clinical therapeutic effects, self-help applications, and existentialism as a whole are excluded.
Original Chinese · summary
把多类存在焦虑组织成可读的公共论证，并以“在……之中仍肯定存在”的勇气概念连接个体、社会与宗教维度。 1952年《存在的勇气》对现代焦虑、绝望、非存在和自我肯定的哲学神学分析；心理诊断、临床治疗效果、自助应用和全部存在主义排除。
M rationaleAn independent public text provides a structured explanation for a broad set of life questions, taking M5.2; dissemination reputation serves only as scope evidence, not as proof of truth value.
Original Chinese · M rationale
独立公共文本对一组广泛人生问题给出结构化解释，取M5.2；传播声誉只作范围证据，不作为真值证明。
attribution rationaleTillich 0.50; existentialist antecedents 0.25; lecture and publishing institutions 0.08; editing and translation 0.07; interlocutors 0.05; unresolved 0.05.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Tillich 0.50；存在主义前史0.25；讲座出版机构0.08；编辑翻译0.07；对话者0.05；未解析0.05。
overlap boundaryThe 1952 'The Courage to Be' offers a philosophical-theological analysis of modern anxiety, despair, nonbeing, and self-affirmation; psychological diagnosis, clinical therapeutic effects, self-help applications, and existentialism as a whole are excluded.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1952年《存在的勇气》对现代焦虑、绝望、非存在和自我肯定的哲学神学分析；心理诊断、临床治疗效果、自助应用和全部存在主义排除。
Evidence gapsRequires verification against the original text and academic criticism for anxiety classification, argument boundaries, and applicability to different readers.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
需原文与学术批评核对焦虑分类、论证边界和不同读者适用性。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.5Paul TillichOriginal Chinese · 保罗·蒂利希Person
- 0.25Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, precursors of existentialism and philosophy of religionOriginal Chinese · 克尔凯郭尔、尼采、海德格尔、存在主义与宗教哲学前驱Predecessor pool
- 0.08Terry Lectures, Yale University, and publishing institutionOriginal Chinese · 特里讲座、耶鲁大学与出版机构Institution
- 0.07Editors, translators, and early critical readersOriginal Chinese · 编辑、译者与早期批评读者Team
- 0.05Psychology, theology, and postwar public discussion interlocutorsOriginal Chinese · 心理学、神学与战后公共讨论对话者Team
- 0.05"The Courage to Be" lectures, editing, and dialogue input pending verification poolOriginal Chinese · 《存在的勇气》讲座、编辑与对话输入待核池Unallocated
Source links
- Yale University Press: The Courage to Be ↗Original Chinese label · 耶鲁大学出版社：《存在的勇气》
03Cultural theology, religious symbolism, and cross-disciplinary dialogue framework文化神学、宗教象征与跨领域对话框架OUT-SL2107-1919-1965-THEOLOGY-OF-CULTURE-INTERPRETIVE-FRAMEWORK
Record yearApproximately 1919–1966
Original Chinese · record year
约1919–1966
summaryApplies the general method already developed in 'Systematic Theology' to material from art, politics, psychology, and interreligious exchange, leaving additional work in selecting subjects, interpreting particular cases, and organizing dialogue. This entry covers Tillich's specific interpretive applications of the existing correlation method, religious symbolism, and ultimate concern to culture, art, and dialogue across traditions. The general theories of correlation and symbolism are already fully accounted for under 'Systematic Theology'; the achievements of the fields themselves, empirical scientific conclusions, and the doctrines of other religions are excluded.
Original Chinese · summary
把已在《系统神学》中形成的通用方法用于艺术、政治、心理与跨宗教材料，留下对象选择、具体解释和对话组织的应用残余。 Tillich把既有通用关联法、宗教象征和终极关切用于文化、艺术及跨传统对话时形成的具体解释应用残余；关联法和象征的一般理论完全由《系统神学》点消费，各领域自身成果、经验科学结论和他宗教教义排除。
M rationaleM5.3 was originally judged from the residue of specific applications in culture, art, and cross-traditional contexts, and is retained. The general correlation method and the theories of religious symbolism and ultimate concern are already accounted for under 'Systematic Theology'; textual clarification does not mechanically change the score, nor is breadth of subject matter mistaken for the sum of achievements in each field.
Original Chinese · M rationale
M5.3原本即按文化艺术与跨传统具体应用残余判断，现保持该值；通用关联方法、宗教象征及终极关切理论已由《系统神学》点消费，不因文案澄清机械调分，也不把题材广度误算成各领域成果总和。
attribution rationaleTillich 0.42; intellectual antecedents 0.29; cultural and religious interlocutors 0.11; editorial scholars 0.07; institutions 0.05; unresolved 0.06.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Tillich 0.42；思想前史0.29；文化与宗教对话者0.11；编辑学者0.07；机构0.05；未解析0.06。
overlap boundaryThe specific interpretive application residues formed when Tillich applied the existing general correlation method, religious symbolism, and ultimate concern to culture, art, and cross-traditional dialogue; the general theories of correlation and symbolism are entirely counted/reused by the "Systematic Theology" points, excluding each field's own achievements, empirical scientific conclusions, and other religious doctrines.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
Tillich把既有通用关联法、宗教象征和终极关切用于文化、艺术及跨传统对话时形成的具体解释应用残余；关联法和象征的一般理论完全由《系统神学》点消费，各领域自身成果、经验科学结论和他宗教教义排除。
Evidence gapsOriginal texts such as 'Theology of Culture' and 'Dynamics of Faith', together with cross-religious criticism, are needed to test the conceptual boundaries.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
需《文化神学》《信仰的动力》等原文和跨宗教批评检验概念边界。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.42Paul TillichOriginal Chinese · 保罗·蒂利希Person
- 0.29Schleiermacher, Luther, Schelling, and precursors in religion, art, and cultureOriginal Chinese · 施莱尔马赫、路德、谢林及宗教、艺术与文化前驱Predecessor pool
- 0.11Artists, social thinkers, religious and cross-religious interlocutorsOriginal Chinese · 艺术家、社会思想家、宗教与跨宗教对话者Team
- 0.07Editors, translators, lecture audiences, and researchersOriginal Chinese · 编辑、译者、讲演听众与研究者Team
- 0.05Universities, publishers, churches, and dialogue institutionsOriginal Chinese · 大学、出版者、教会与对话机构Institution
- 0.06Cultural-theology texts, editorial input, and dialogue input: pool pending verificationOriginal Chinese · 文化神学文本、编辑与对话输入待核池Unallocated
Source links
- Cambridge University Press: An Introduction to the Study of Paul Tillich ↗Original Chinese label · 剑桥大学出版社：Paul Tillich研究导论
BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED
Not included in this score
These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.
Religious socialism, anti-Nazi public action
宗教社会主义、反纳粹公共行动
Reason The materials confirm the political ethics and the background of dismissal by the Nazis in 1933, but independently reviewable organizations, texts, and policy deliverables have not yet been established.
Original Chinese reason
资料确认政治伦理和1933年遭纳粹免职背景，但未闭合可独立审查的组织、文本与政策交付。
Preaching and teaching services
讲道与教学服务
Reason There is evidence of preaching and teaching, but a completed service contribution independent of the three intellectual texts has not yet been established.
Original Chinese reason
可确认他有讲道与教学线索，但尚未证明独立于三项思想文本的服务终态。
Original versions, lecture manuscripts, and editorial archives
原始版本、讲稿与编辑档案
Reason Publisher descriptions and research introductions can support the scope of the works, but are insufficient to distinguish, item by item, the formation of correlation, ultimate concern, symbolism, and cultural application.
Original Chinese reason
出版社描述与研究导论能支持作品范围，但不足以逐项分清关联、终极关切、象征和文化应用的形成过程。
Clinical, self-help, and cultural reception effects
临床、自助与文化接受效果
Reason 'The Courage to Be' is not a clinical guide; the psychological, theological, artistic, and religious discussions influenced by it have their own research and practical responsibilities.
Original Chinese reason
《存在的勇气》不是临床指南；受其影响的心理、神学、艺术和宗教讨论有各自的研究与实践责任。
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →