PERSON · STARLIGHT

Thomas Chalmers

Recorded name: 托马斯·查尔莫斯

Thomas Chalmers was a Scottish minister, educator, and church organizer.

Original Chinese introduction

托马斯·查尔莫斯是苏格兰牧师、教育与教会组织者。

In early nineteenth-century Glasgow and the Church of Scotland, he advanced parish organization, education, church extension, and natural-theology writing.

Original Chinese context

他在十九世纪早期的格拉斯哥和苏格兰教会中推动堂区组织、教育、教会扩建与自然神学写作。

Introduction sources
Provisional score5.13

Displayed to two decimal places.

Score tierNova T5

Derived from the current score.

Evaluated contributions5

Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.

ASSESSMENT SCOPE

What this score covers

All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.

Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.

5 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.

Original scope note

This research record currently includes 5 outcomes within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.

Original Chinese scope

本轮当前已列5项有限研究账;M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理,具体缺口见逐项说明。

Open Chinese score details →

Download the full score details (JSON, Chinese notes)

CALCULATION

How the score is calculated

Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).

M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.

See a simple scoring example →

SCORE DETAILS

5 evaluated contributions

M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.

Chinese score details →

Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.

OutcomeMAttribution shareAttributed lightStandalone scoreShare of totalStatus
01Astronomy lectures and the natural-theology text The Adaptation of External Nature天文学讲演与《外部自然的适应》自然神学文本OUT-SL3361-1817-1833-NATURAL-THEOLOGY-PUBLIC-CORPUS · 18174.843%107.5811174.0729.3778%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
02Urban discourse in The Christian and Civic Economy of Large Towns《大城市的基督教与公民经济》城市论述OUT-SL3361-1821-1826-CHRISTIAN-CIVIC-ECONOMY-TEXT · 18214.744%98.0637303.9926.7789%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
03Free Church founding-period leadership and sustentation-fund organizationFree Church创立期领导与sustentation fund组织OUT-SL3361-1843-1847-FREE-CHURCH-SUSTENTATION-FUND · 18435.215%59.5660763.5616.2661%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
04St John's parish district visitation and school service圣约翰堂区分区探访与学校服务OUT-SL3361-1819-1823-ST-JOHNS-EDUCATION-PARISH-SERVICE · 18194.918%50.5508933.4213.8042%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
05Church extension and community-mission infrastructure organization教堂扩建与社区传教基础设施组织OUT-SL3361-1830S-CHURCH-EXTENSION-CONGREGATIONAL-INFRASTRUCTURE · 18205.016%50.4364433.4213.7730%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence

On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.

NOTES AND SOURCES

Contribution notes and source links

English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.

01Astronomy lectures and the natural-theology text The Adaptation of External Nature天文学讲演与《外部自然的适应》自然神学文本OUT-SL3361-1817-1833-NATURAL-THEOLOGY-PUBLIC-CORPUS

Record year1817

summaryAstronomy lectures and the natural-theology text The Adaptation of External Nature. Ethical instruction, natural-theological/evidential teaching, and continuity of the major text.

Original Chinese · summary

天文学讲演与《外部自然的适应》自然神学文本。伦理、自然神学/证据讲授及主要文本连续性。

M rationaleResearch on the original works and theological scholarship support the formation of a continuous family of natural-theology texts; its independent value lies in conceptual integration and public expression, while empirical foundations and teleological limits are inseparable, yielding M4.8.

Original Chinese · M rationale

原著研究与神学论文支持其形成连续自然神学文本族;独立价值在概念整合与公共表达,经验基础和目的论局限不可分,取M4.8。

attribution rationaleChalmers 0.43, prehistory of theological philosophy 0.25, scientific prehistory 0.10, institutions 0.09, editors and readers 0.04, unresolved 0.09.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Chalmers0.43,神学哲学前史0.25,科学前史0.10,机构0.09,编辑读者0.04,未解析0.09。

overlap boundaryThe natural-theology text family from the 1817 astronomy lectures to the 1833 Bridgewater Treatise, counting its public conceptual organization across astronomy, moral psychology, and theology; theological propositions are not treated as empirical scientific discoveries.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1817天文学讲演至1833 Bridgewater Treatise的自然神学文本族,计其跨天文学、道德心理与神学的公共概念组织;不把神学命题当经验科学发现。

Evidence gapsIts independent increment relative to Paley and contemporary Bridgewater works has not yet been compared chapter by chapter; the scale of public dissemination and the division of labor in version editing have not been fully checked.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

尚未逐章比较其与Paley及同时代Bridgewater著作的独立增量。;公共传播规模和版本编辑分工未完整核。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.43Thomas ChalmersOriginal Chinese · 托马斯·查尔莫斯Person
  • 0.25Prehistory of design argument, Scottish philosophy, and natural theologyOriginal Chinese · 设计论证、苏格兰哲学和自然神学前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.1Contemporary astronomy and natural-philosophy precursorsOriginal Chinese · 同期天文学与自然哲学前驱Predecessor pool
  • 0.09Bridgewater Trust and lecture institutionsOriginal Chinese · 布里奇沃特信托与讲演机构Institution
  • 0.04Text-production and public-discussion input teamOriginal Chinese · 文本制作及公共讨论输入团队Team
  • 0.09Unresolved contributions of scientific materials, editing, and version differencesOriginal Chinese · 未解析的科学资料、编辑及版本差异贡献Unallocated

Source links

02Urban discourse in The Christian and Civic Economy of Large Towns《大城市的基督教与公民经济》城市论述OUT-SL3361-1821-1826-CHRISTIAN-CIVIC-ECONOMY-TEXT

Record year1821

summaryUrban discourse in Christian and Civic Economy of Large Towns. The completed three-volume work and its scope of urban Christian moral economy.

Original Chinese · summary

《大城市的基督教与公民经济》城市论述。三卷作品终态及城市基督教道德—经济范围。

M rationaleThe three volumes' systematization and value for public debate are clear, but their opposition to statutory relief and attribution of poverty did not receive support from practical success; these inseparable normative and factual limitations enter M, scored 4.7.

Original Chinese · M rationale

三卷文本的系统化和公共论辩价值明确,但其反法定救济和贫困归因未获实践成功支持;这些不可分规范与事实局限进入M,取4.7。

attribution rationaleChalmers 0.44, practical contributors 0.10, theoretical predecessors 0.22, publishing institutions 0.08, contemporary debaters 0.06, unresolved 0.10.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Chalmers0.44,实践贡献0.10,理论前史0.22,出版机构0.08,同代论辩0.06,未解析0.10。

overlap boundaryThe completed 1821–1826 three-volume text on urban organization, Christian morality, and political economy; its claims about poverty, population, and self-help enter the net boundary together with their known failures, without a separate M for the ‘poor-relief debate.’

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1821–1826三卷本关于城市组织、基督教道德与政治经济的文本终态;贫困、人口和自助主张作为文本内容与已知失败一并进入净边界,不另设“济贫论辩”M。

Evidence gapsEmpirical reports, theological claims, and economic propositions have not been distinguished chapter by chapter. Reception history and policy causation have not been verified and do not enter this item.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

未逐章区分经验报告、神学主张与经济命题。;接受史和政策因果未核,不进入本点。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.44Thomas ChalmersOriginal Chinese · 托马斯·查尔莫斯Person
  • 0.1St John's parish-practice participantsOriginal Chinese · 圣约翰堂区实践参与者Team
  • 0.22Malthus, Smith, and Scottish political-economy predecessorsOriginal Chinese · 马尔萨斯、斯密与苏格兰政治经济学前驱Predecessor pool
  • 0.08Original publishing and text-production institutionsOriginal Chinese · 原始出版与文本生产机构Institution
  • 0.06Participants in contemporary urban-reform debatesOriginal Chinese · 同期城市改革论辩参与者Team
  • 0.1Unresolved editors, individual sources, and practical contributorsOriginal Chinese · 未解析的编辑、个别资料来源与实践贡献Unallocated

Source links

03Free Church founding-period leadership and sustentation-fund organizationFree Church创立期领导与sustentation fund组织OUT-SL3361-1843-1847-FREE-CHURCH-SUSTENTATION-FUND

Record year1843

summaryFree Church founding-period leadership and sustentation-fund organization. In 1843, about one third of ministers withdrew and formed the Free Church, demonstrating the collective end state.

Original Chinese · summary

Free Church创立期领导与sustentation fund组织。1843约三分之一牧师退出并形成Free Church,证明集体终态。

M rationaleOfficial history establishes a large-scale collective schism, and biography establishes his connection to the sustentation fund; this is a concrete institutional delivery, but individual decision records have not been fully resolved, so it receives M5.2 with the collective holding the larger share.

Original Chinese · M rationale

官方历史可证大规模集体分裂,传记可证其与sustentation fund关联;这是具体制度交付但个人决策档案未完全解析,取M5.2并给集体多数份额。

attribution rationaleChalmers 0.15, collective organization 0.47, predecessors 0.10, institutions 0.12, contributing congregations 0.09, unresolved 0.07.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Chalmers0.15,集体组织0.47,前史0.10,机构0.12,捐助会众0.09,未解析0.07。

overlap boundaryThe new church establishment and sustentation fund during the 1843–1847 schism; this excludes the Free Church's later education, missions, or all denominational effects, and is mutually exclusive with the earlier church extension by period and institutional end state.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1843–1847分裂时期的新教会建制与持续供养基金,不含Free Church后世教育、传教或全部宗派成效;与此前教堂扩建按时间和机构终态互斥。

Evidence gapsThe 1843 meeting minutes and fund charter have not been read; his specific proposals and division of labor with colleagues remain to be verified. Fund coverage and distributive fairness have not been audited.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

未读1843会议记录和基金章程,个人具体提案及同僚分工仍待核。;基金覆盖与分配公平未审计。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.15Thomas ChalmersOriginal Chinese · 托马斯·查尔莫斯Person
  • 0.47Church-establishment ministers, congregations, and fund organizersOriginal Chinese · 教会建制牧师、会众与基金组织者Team
  • 0.1Prehistory of church-autonomy disputes and Presbyterian institutionsOriginal Chinese · 教会自治争论和长老宗制度前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.12Free Church of ScotlandOriginal Chinese · 苏格兰自由教会Institution
  • 0.09Fund resources and local maintenance labor teamsOriginal Chinese · 基金资源与本地维持劳动团队Team
  • 0.07Unresolved meetings, fund design, and colleague contributionsOriginal Chinese · 未解析的会议、基金设计和同僚贡献Unallocated

Source links

04St John's parish district visitation and school service圣约翰堂区分区探访与学校服务OUT-SL3361-1819-1823-ST-JOHNS-EDUCATION-PARISH-SERVICE

Record year1819

summarySt John's parish district visitation and school service. St John’s assumption of responsibility, districting, elders and deacons, and day-school/Sunday-school organization.

Original Chinese · summary

圣约翰堂区分区探访与学校服务。St John接管、分区、长执与日校/主日学校组织。

M rationaleDistrict organization and schools are actual service end states, separable in the evidence from the failed poor-relief mechanism; it receives M4.9 for local urban education and organizational delivery.

Original Chinese · M rationale

分区组织与学校是实际服务终态,且与失败的济贫机制可在证据上分开;按局部城市教育和组织交付取M4.9。

attribution rationaleChalmers 0.18, direct workers 0.38, predecessors 0.12, institutions 0.08, unresolved 0.24.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Chalmers0.18,直接工作人员0.38,前史0.12,机构0.08,未解析0.24。

overlap boundaryDistrict visitation, day-school, and Sunday-school delivery in St John's parish from 1819–1823; counts only the education and organization regarded as relatively successful by university research, and does not present the financially and practically failed voluntary poor-relief scheme as welfare improvement.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1819–1823圣约翰堂区的分区探访、日校与主日学校交付;只计大学研究明确认为较成功的教育与组织部分,不把财政和实践失败的志愿济贫方案写成福利改善。

Evidence gapsAuditable details of school coverage, attendance, duration, and different teacher roles have not been established. The conclusion of educational success derives from an article abstract and has not yet been checked school by school. Household feedback and contributions' specific inputs into the listed education services remain to be verified; collaborative shares are not inferred from beneficiary status for now.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

学校覆盖、出勤、持续时长和不同教师角色未形成可审计明细。;教育成功结论来自论文摘要,尚未按校逐项校验。;家庭反馈与捐助对已列教育服务的具体输入待核,暂不从受益身份推定协作份额。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.18Thomas ChalmersOriginal Chinese · 托马斯·查尔莫斯Person
  • 0.38St John's parish elders, deacons, and teachersOriginal Chinese · 圣约翰堂区长老、执事与教师Team
  • 0.12Prehistory of parish, elder-and-deacon governance, and school traditionsOriginal Chinese · 教区、长执治理和学校传统前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.08Glasgow City Council and St John's parishOriginal Chinese · 格拉斯哥市议会与圣约翰教区Institution
  • 0.24Unresolved teacher, donor, and administrative contributionsOriginal Chinese · 未解析的教师、捐助者与行政贡献Unallocated

Source links

05Church extension and community-mission infrastructure organization教堂扩建与社区传教基础设施组织OUT-SL3361-1830S-CHURCH-EXTENSION-CONGREGATIONAL-INFRASTRUCTURE

Record year1820

summaryChurch extension and community-mission infrastructure organization. Extension was not merely an increase in seating, but an organizational path that made the church a mission center.

Original Chinese · summary

教堂扩建与社区传教基础设施组织。扩建不只增座位,而以教堂作为传教中心的组织路线。

M rationaleUniversity of Glasgow research supports an extension approach with a community-mission design distinct from simply increasing seating; it receives M5.0 for limited infrastructure and organizational delivery.

Original Chinese · M rationale

格拉斯哥大学研究支持扩建路线具有区别于单纯增加座位的社区传教设计;按有限基础设施和组织交付取M5.0。

attribution rationaleChalmers 0.16, organizers/ministers/congregations 0.43, predecessors 0.11, church institutions 0.15, local funding and construction 0.08, unresolved 0.07.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Chalmers0.16,组织/牧师/会众0.43,前史0.11,教会机构0.15,地方资金施工0.08,未解析0.07。

overlap boundaryThe organizational path in Scotland's church-extension movement of the 1830s that made churches community-mission centers; it does not count all later congregational, educational, and missionary effects.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1830年代苏格兰教堂扩建运动中以教堂为社区传教中心的组织路线;不计所有后来会众、教育和传教效果。

Evidence gapsNo church-by-church list of completion, finances, and use has been obtained. Chalmers's individual decision chain for each project remains unclear.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

未得到逐座教堂的建成、财务和使用清单。;Chalmers个人对每个项目的决策链仍不清楚。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.16Thomas ChalmersOriginal Chinese · 托马斯·查尔莫斯Person
  • 0.43Fundraising, construction, pastoral, and community-delivery teamsOriginal Chinese · 筹资、建造、牧养和社区交付团队Team
  • 0.11Prehistory of parish and missionary-organization modelsOriginal Chinese · 教区与传教组织模式前史Predecessor pool
  • 0.15Church of Scotland and local parishesOriginal Chinese · 苏格兰教会与地方教区Institution
  • 0.08Funding, construction, and local implementation teamsOriginal Chinese · 资金、施工与地方执行团队Team
  • 0.07Unresolved individual decisions and collaborative contributions in the projectsOriginal Chinese · 未解析的项目的个人决策及合作贡献Unallocated

Source links

BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED

Not included in this score

These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.

Unverified versions, implementation, and subsequent effects

未逐项核实的版本、实施与后续影响

Reason Existing materials have not individually resolved every version, participant, and long-term effect, so no attribution beyond the evidence is made.

Original Chinese reason

现有材料未逐项解析所有版本、参与者及长期效果,故不作超出证据的归因。