PERSON · STARLIGHT

Amos Tversky

Recorded name: 阿莫斯·特沃斯基

Amos Tversky was a psychologist who studied how people judge, choose, and compare things.

Original Chinese introduction

阿莫斯·特沃斯基是心理学家,研究人如何判断、选择和比较事物。

Tversky and Daniel Kahneman jointly studied heuristics, cognitive biases, and risk choice, proposing and revising prospect theory. He also studied preference, similarity, and psychometrics, and coauthored the three volumes of Foundations of Measurement with Krantz, Luce, and Suppes. His work combined psychological experiments with mathematical models, revealing differences between everyday judgment and traditional rational models.

Original Chinese context

特沃斯基与丹尼尔·卡尼曼共同研究启发式、认知偏差与风险选择,提出并修订前景理论。他也研究偏好、相似性和心理测量,与克兰茨、卢斯、萨普斯合著三卷《测量基础》。他的工作将心理实验与数学模型结合,揭示了日常判断与传统理性模型之间的差异。

Introduction sources
Provisional score6.69

Displayed to two decimal places.

Score tierPlanet T6

Derived from the current score.

Evaluated contributions5

Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.

ASSESSMENT SCOPE

What this score covers

All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.

Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.

5 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.

Original scope note

This research record currently includes 5 outcomes within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.

Original Chinese scope

本轮当前已列5项有限研究账;M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理,具体缺口见逐项说明。

Open Chinese score details →

Download the full score details (JSON, Chinese notes)

CALCULATION

How the score is calculated

Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).

M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.

See a simple scoring example →

SCORE DETAILS

5 evaluated contributions

M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.

Chinese score details →

Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.

OutcomeMAttribution shareAttributed lightStandalone scoreShare of totalStatus
01Evolution of risk-choice models in prospect theory and cumulative prospect theory前景理论与累计前景理论的风险选择模型演进OUT-SL1350-1979-PROSPECT-THEORY · 1979–19926.734%760.8251875.7634.2376%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
02Feature-comparison model of similarity judgment相似性判断的特征对比模型OUT-SL1350-1977-CONTRAST-MODEL-OF-SIMILARITY · 19775.950%445.1254695.3020.0309%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
03Research on heuristics, biases, and framing effects in judgment under uncertainty不确定判断的启发式、偏差与框架效应研究OUT-SL1350-1971-1984-HEURISTICS-BIASES-AND-FRAMING · 1970s–1980s6.331%437.5766395.2819.6912%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
04Preference intransitivity and the choice-by-elimination model偏好非传递性与按属性淘汰选择模型OUT-SL1350-1969-1972-INTRANSITIVE-PREFERENCES-AND-ELIMINATION-BY-ASPECTS · 1969–19725.948%427.3204505.2619.2297%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence
05Polynomial conjoint measurement and Foundations of Measurement多项式联合测量与《Foundations of Measurement》OUT-SL1350-1967-1990-POLYNOMIAL-CONJOINT-FOUNDATIONS-MEASUREMENT · 1967–19905.917%151.3426594.376.8105%Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence

On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.

NOTES AND SOURCES

Contribution notes and source links

English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.

01Evolution of risk-choice models in prospect theory and cumulative prospect theory前景理论与累计前景理论的风险选择模型演进OUT-SL1350-1979-PROSPECT-THEORY

Record year1979–1992

summary1979 presented models of reference dependence, the value function, and decision weights; in 1992 the same authors changed them into a cumulative representation, extending multi-outcome/uncertain choice and correcting the boundary of stochastic dominance.

Original Chinese · summary

1979给出参照依赖、价值函数和决策权重模型;1992由同一作者将其改成累计表示,扩展多结果/不确定选择并修正随机支配边界。

M rationaleCASBS, SEP, and the 1992 original paper support the two authors' model evolution. M6.7 is assigned for original-model foundation, cumulative revision, and scope of extension; 1992 is not treated as an external successor, nor is M duplicated by two papers.

Original Chinese · M rationale

CASBS、SEP及1992原论文支持两位作者的模型演进。按原模型奠基、累计修订及扩展范围取M6.7;不是把1992当外部后继,也不按两篇论文复制M。

attribution rationaleTversky/Kahneman each .34, team .05, prior work .15, institutions .04, unresolved .08.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Tversky/Kahneman各 .34,团队 .05,前史 .15,机构 .04,未解析 .08。

overlap boundaryThe original 1979 prospect theory and Tversky/Kahneman's 1992 cumulative prospect theory: reference points, the value function, probability weighting, and treating multi-outcome/uncertain choices by cumulative probabilities; do not claim financial markets, policy, or all behavioral economics.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1979原始前景理论及Tversky/Kahneman 1992累计前景理论:参照点、价值函数、概率权重与按累积概率处理多结果/不确定选择;不领取金融市场、政策和全部行为经济学。

Evidence gapsThe division of labor between the 1979/1992 authors, data inputs, and the actual predictive increment of the cumulative revision still require original-manuscript archives.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

1979/1992作者分工、数据输入及累计修订的实际预测增量仍需原稿档案。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.34Amos TverskyOriginal Chinese · 阿莫斯·特沃斯基Person
  • 0.34Daniel KahnemanOriginal Chinese · 丹尼尔·卡尼曼Person
  • 0.05Prospect-theory research and manuscript-support teamOriginal Chinese · 前景理论研究与文稿支持团队Team
  • 0.15Predecessors in expected utility, risk choice, and decision theoryOriginal Chinese · 期望效用、风险选择与决策理论前驱Predecessor pool
  • 0.04CASBS, Stanford, and publishing institutionsOriginal Chinese · CASBS、斯坦福与出版机构Institution
  • 0.08Unallocated prospect-theory contributionsOriginal Chinese · 未分配的前景理论贡献Unallocated

Source links

02Feature-comparison model of similarity judgment相似性判断的特征对比模型OUT-SL1350-1977-CONTRAST-MODEL-OF-SIMILARITY

Record year1977

summaryChallenged metric/dimensional assumptions, using a contrast model of feature matching to explain asymmetry, context, and common/distinctive-feature effects.

Original Chinese · summary

质疑度量/维度假设,以特征匹配的对比模型解释非对称、情境和共同/区别特征效应。

M rationaleThe original paper's abstract and first page of text make the model, assumptions, experimental subjects, and scope of generalization explicit; M5.9 is assigned for an independent form and experimental outcome.

Original Chinese · M rationale

原论文摘要与正文首页明确模型、假设、实验对象和推广范围,按独立形式与实验终态取M5.9。

attribution rationaleTversky .50, research-discussion team .09, prior work .24, institutions .04, unresolved .13.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Tversky .50,研究讨论团队 .09,前史 .24,机构 .04,未解析 .13。

overlap boundaryThe set-feature representation, common/distinctive-feature weighting, and explanations of asymmetrical and contextual similarity in 1977 Features of Similarity; do not claim successor classification, machine learning, or consumer applications.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1977《Features of Similarity》的集合特征表示、共同/区别特征加权及非对称、情境相似性解释;不领取后继分类、机器学习或消费者应用。

Evidence gapsSpecific discussion collaborators, experimental materials, and subsequent revisions remain unresolved.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

具体共同讨论者、实验材料和后续修正未闭合。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.5Amos TverskyOriginal Chinese · 阿莫斯·特沃斯基Person
  • 0.09Tversky similarity-research and discussion collaboratorsOriginal Chinese · 特沃斯基相似性研究与讨论合作者Team
  • 0.24Predecessors in geometrical similarity, clustering, prototypes, and featuresOriginal Chinese · 几何相似性、聚类、原型与特征前驱Predecessor pool
  • 0.04Similarity research at the Hebrew University and Psychological ReviewOriginal Chinese · 希伯来大学与《心理学评论》相似性研究Institution
  • 0.13Unallocated similarity-model contributionsOriginal Chinese · 未分配的相似性模型贡献Unallocated

Source links

03Research on heuristics, biases, and framing effects in judgment under uncertainty不确定判断的启发式、偏差与框架效应研究OUT-SL1350-1971-1984-HEURISTICS-BIASES-AND-FRAMING

Record year1970s–1980s

Original Chinese · record year

1970年代—1980年代

summaryUsed a series of experiments to show predictable departures in judgment due to simplified heuristics and presentation frames, and provided a testable classification.

Original Chinese · summary

用成组实验显示判断对简化启发式与呈现框架存在可预测偏离,并提供可检验分类。

M rationaleThe joint-paper bibliography confirms representative works on heuristics and framing. M6.3 is assigned for testable psychological mechanisms and a research agenda across tasks; differences in replication, task dependence, and the risk of mistaking description for universal causal prescription all limit M.

Original Chinese · M rationale

共同论文目录确认启发式与框架代表作,按跨任务的可检验心理机制与研究议程取M6.3;复制差异、任务依赖和把描述误作普遍因果处方的风险均限制M。

attribution rationaleTversky .31, Kahneman .31, research execution .07, prior work .16, institutions .04, unresolved .11.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Tversky .31,Kahneman .31,研究执行 .07,前史 .16,机构 .04,未解析 .11。

overlap boundaryThe body of joint experiments and discussions on representativeness, availability, anchoring, and framing effects from the 1970s through the 1980s; it excludes prospect theory's formal risk model and does not claim all behavioral economics, policy applications, or successor replications.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1970年代至1980年代代表性、可得性、锚定及框架效应的共同实验与论述族;不含前景理论正式风险模型,不领取全部行为经济学、政策应用或后继复制。

Evidence gapsSample sizes, materials, research assistants, and replication boundaries for individual experiments remain unresolved.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

逐实验样本、材料、研究助理与复制边界未闭合。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.31Amos TverskyOriginal Chinese · 阿莫斯·特沃斯基Person
  • 0.31Daniel KahnemanOriginal Chinese · 丹尼尔·卡尼曼Person
  • 0.07Tversky–Kahneman research-assistant and data teamOriginal Chinese · 特沃斯基–卡尼曼研究助理与数据团队Team
  • 0.16Predecessors in judgment, decision, statistics, and bounded rationalityOriginal Chinese · 判断、决策、统计与有限理性前驱Predecessor pool
  • 0.04Unallocated early institutional supportOriginal Chinese · 未分配的早期机构支持Unallocated
  • 0.11Unallocated contributions to heuristics researchOriginal Chinese · 未分配的启发式研究贡献Unallocated

Source links

04Preference intransitivity and the choice-by-elimination model偏好非传递性与按属性淘汰选择模型OUT-SL1350-1969-1972-INTRANSITIVE-PREFERENCES-AND-ELIMINATION-BY-ASPECTS

Record year1969–1972

summaryDemonstrated that intransitive preferences can systematically occur under specific conditions, and provided a process theory of attribute-by-attribute elimination that can be tested by choice probabilities and extends existing models.

Original Chinese · summary

证明特定条件下非传递偏好可系统出现,并给出逐属性淘汰、可由选择概率检验且推广既有模型的过程理论。

M rationaleThe 1969 abstract and the 1972 original-paper abstract support the experimental proposition and model outcome, assigning M5.9; M is not duplicated for two papers.

Original Chinese · M rationale

1969摘要与1972原论文摘要支持实验命题和模型终态,取M5.9;不按两篇论文复制M。

attribution rationaleTversky .48, research team .08, prior work .25, institutions .04, unresolved .15.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Tversky .48,研究团队 .08,前史 .25,机构 .04,未解析 .15。

overlap boundaryThe predictable preference-intransitivity experiment of 1969 and the 1972 attribute-by-attribute elimination/choice-by-elimination model; the two are combined as a continuous theoretical family of ‘attribute-by-attribute choice without global utility,’ excluding risk prospect models.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

1969可预测偏好非传递性实验与1972按属性淘汰/choice-by-elimination模型;二者按‘非全局效用的逐属性选择’连续理论族合并,不含风险前景模型。

Evidence gapsModel uptake between the two papers and personnel jointly carrying out the experiments remain unresolved.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

两篇之间的模型消费及实验共同执行人员未闭合。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.48Amos TverskyOriginal Chinese · 阿莫斯·特沃斯基Person
  • 0.08Tversky choice experiments and research teamOriginal Chinese · 特沃斯基选择实验与研究团队Team
  • 0.25Luce, Restle, and predecessors in utility measurementOriginal Chinese · 卢斯、雷斯特尔与效用测量前驱Predecessor pool
  • 0.04Hebrew University and Psychological ReviewOriginal Chinese · 希伯来大学与《心理学评论》Institution
  • 0.15Unallocated choice-model contributionsOriginal Chinese · 未分配的选择模型贡献Unallocated

Source links

05Polynomial conjoint measurement and Foundations of Measurement多项式联合测量与《Foundations of Measurement》OUT-SL1350-1967-1990-POLYNOMIAL-CONJOINT-FOUNDATIONS-MEASUREMENT

Record year1967–1990

summaryExtended conjoint measurement to partial orders, finite structures, and general polynomial models, and systematized with coauthors the bases for additive, polynomial, and other representations/uniqueness.

Original Chinese · summary

将联合测量推广到部分序、有限结构及一般多项式模型,并与共同作者系统整理加法、多项式及其他表征/唯一性基础。

M rationaleThe Michigan original-paper page makes the 1967 five types of extension explicit, and the bibliography of the three volumes makes four coauthors explicit. M5.9 is assigned for an independent formal system and is not duplicated because of the number of volumes.

Original Chinese · M rationale

Michigan原论文页明确1967五类推广,三卷书目明确四位共同作者。按独立形式体系取M5.9,不因卷数复制。

attribution rationaleTversky/Krantz/Luce/Suppes each .17, prior work excluding Luce .15, publishing .04, unresolved .13.

Original Chinese · attribution rationale

Tversky/Krantz/Luce/Suppes各.17,排除Luce后的前史.15,出版.04,未解析.13。

overlap boundaryTversky's 1967 general polynomial conjoint measurement, and the representational system in the three 1971, 1989, and 1990 volumes of Foundations of Measurement by Krantz/Luce/Suppes/Tversky; do not claim the Luce–Tukey 1964 original invention or consumer applications.

Original Chinese · overlap boundary

Tversky 1967一般多项式联合测量,以及Krantz/Luce/Suppes/Tversky 1971、1989、1990三卷《Foundations of Measurement》的表征体系;不领取Luce–Tukey 1964首创或消费者应用。

Evidence gapsDivision of labor chapter by chapter across the three volumes, and the specific extent to which the 1967 paper was consumed by the first volume, remain unresolved.

Original Chinese · evidence gaps

三卷逐章分工及1967论文被第一卷消费的具体程度未闭合。

Full attribution budget

Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.

  • 0.17Amos TverskyOriginal Chinese · 阿莫斯·特沃斯基Person
  • 0.17David H. KrantzOriginal Chinese · 大卫·H.克兰茨Person
  • 0.17R. Duncan LuceOriginal Chinese · R.邓肯·卢斯Person
  • 0.17Patrick SuppesOriginal Chinese · 帕特里克·萨普斯Person
  • 0.15Predecessors in measurement theory, including John Tukey, Campbell, and HölderOriginal Chinese · 约翰·图基、坎贝尔、赫尔德等测量论前驱Predecessor pool
  • 0.04Academic Press and the measurement-theory publishing chainOriginal Chinese · Academic Press与测量论出版链Institution
  • 0.13Unallocated foundational contributions to measurement theoryOriginal Chinese · 未分配的测量论基础贡献Unallocated

Source links

BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED

Not included in this score

These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.

Spatial cognition and late collaborative research

空间认知及晚期合作研究

Reason The initial package only notes that it has not been recalled; no evidence of a principal outcome is yet available.

Original Chinese reason

初包只提示未召回,尚无主要终态证据。