Displayed to two decimal places.
PERSON · STARLIGHT
Kiyoo Mogi
Recorded name: 茂木清夫
Kiyoo Mogi was a Japanese seismologist.
Original Chinese introduction
茂木清夫是日本地震学家。
He studied seismic activity, source processes, and earthquake hazards, and emphasized uncertainty.
Original Chinese context
他研究地震活动、震源过程和地震危险性,并强调不确定性。
- Public material: gbank.gsj.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:gbank.gsj.jp
- Public material: www.jstage.jst.go.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:www.jstage.jst.go.jp
Derived from the current score.
Contribution groups assessed so far; coverage is still being expanded.
ASSESSMENT SCOPEWhat this score covers
All included contribution titles and notes are available in English. The complete original text remains available in Chinese; both editions use the same scores and source links.
Uncovered contributions and unresolved harms are not treated as zero. This is not a complete assessment of a lifetime.
4 included contributions have incomplete evidence; the relevant gap appears with that contribution.
Original scope note
This research record currently includes 4 outcomes within a limited scope; M and attribution shares are revisable judgments. Uncovered content and negative effects not yet clarified are not treated as zero; specific gaps appear in the item-by-item explanations.
Original Chinese scope
本轮当前已列4项有限研究账;M与归功份额为可修订判断。未覆盖内容和未核清的负面作用不按零处理,具体缺口见逐项说明。
CALCULATIONHow the score is calculated
Q = 10^(M/2) − 1; Lᵢ = aᵢ × Qᵢ; L = Σ Lᵢ; S = 2 × log₁₀(1 + L).
M is an outcome’s assessed magnitude and a is the person’s allocated share. A standalone score is only a per-item reference; the attributed light from distinct contributions is what can be combined.
SCORE DETAILS
4 evaluated contributions
M is the assessed magnitude of an outcome; attribution is the person’s share of credit. Attributed light can be added. The standalone score is only a per-item reference and must not be added across rows.
Scroll sideways for scores and attribution.
| Outcome | M | Attribution share | Attributed light | Standalone score | Share of total | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01Buried pressure-source model of volcanic surface deformation火山地表形变的埋藏压力源模型OUT-SL1927-1958-VOLCANO-DEFORMATION-PRESSURE-SOURCE-MODEL · 1958 | 6.0 | 40% | 399.600000 | 5.21 | 34.8662% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 02Classification of foreshock, aftershock, swarm, and large-earthquake spatiotemporal sequences前震、余震、群震与大震时空序列分类OUT-SL1927-1963-1990-EARTHQUAKE-SEQUENCE-AND-FAULT-HETEROGENEITY · 1963 | 5.8 | 43% | 341.131141 | 5.07 | 29.7646% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 03Analysis of regional variation in earthquake magnitude–frequency parameters地震震级—频度参数的区域差异分析OUT-SL1927-1966-1967-REGIONAL-MAGNITUDE-FREQUENCY-VARIATION · 1966 | 5.4 | 42% | 210.078638 | 4.65 | 18.3299% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
| 04Tokai long-term risk judgment and critique of the earthquake-prediction system东海长期风险判断与地震预测制度批判OUT-SL1927-1969-2004-TOKAI-RISK-AND-PREDICTION-CRITIQUE · 1969 | 5.6 | 31% | 195.286777 | 4.59 | 17.0393% | Provisional estimate · incomplete evidence |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally to reach every numeric column.
NOTES AND SOURCES
Contribution notes and source links
English translations of the included notes appear below, with their Chinese originals available for comparison.
01Buried pressure-source model of volcanic surface deformation火山地表形变的埋藏压力源模型OUT-SL1927-1958-VOLCANO-DEFORMATION-PRESSURE-SOURCE-MODEL
Record year1958
summaryBuried pressure-source model of volcanic surface deformation. The completed outcome of the 1958 original paper.
Original Chinese · summary
火山地表形变的埋藏压力源模型。1958原论文作品终态。
M rationaleGSJ verifies the 1958 original paper, and a 1971 peer paper explicitly states that its model explains Sakurajima/Hawaii and is an important perspective on volcanic mechanisms; take M6.0 for a highly reusable scientific model.
Original Chinese · M rationale
GSJ核实1958原论文,1971同行论文明确其模型解释Sakurajima/Hawaii并作为重要火山机制视角;按高复用科学模型取M6.0。
attribution rationaleMogi 0.40, Yamakawa 0.14, geodetic team 0.17, prior work 0.15, University of Tokyo 0.06, unresolved 0.08.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Mogi0.40,Yamakawa0.14,测地团队0.17,前史0.15,东京大学0.06,未解析0.08。
overlap boundaryThe 1958 explanation of surface deformation around Sakurajima and Hawaii volcanoes using a small spherical inflation/deflation pressure source in an elastic half-space; it does not claim that real magma systems are all spherical, nor claim subsequent numerical volcanic models.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1958以半无限弹性介质中小球形胀缩压力源解释Sakurajima与Hawaii火山周围地表形变;不声称真实岩浆系统均为球形,也不领取后续数值火山模型。
Evidence gapsThe original-paper derivation and observational residuals have not been checked page by page; shares for Yamakawa and producers of geodetic materials still require original citation tables.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
未逐页核原论文推导与观测残差。;Yamakawa及测地资料生产者份额仍需原始引用表。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.4Kiyoo MogiOriginal Chinese · 茂木清夫Person
- 0.14Takeo YamakawaPerson
- 0.17Surface-deformation observational-data teamOriginal Chinese · 地表形变观测资料团队Team
- 0.15Earlier work in elastic theory, geodesy, and volcanic-structure interpretationOriginal Chinese · 弹性理论、测地与火山构造解释前史Predecessor pool
- 0.06Earthquake Research Institute, University of TokyoOriginal Chinese · 东京大学地震研究所Institution
- 0.08Unresolved contributions to data production, derivational assistance, and material selectionOriginal Chinese · 未解析的数据生产、推导辅助和资料选择贡献Unallocated
Source links
- Public material: gbank.gsj.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:gbank.gsj.jp
- Public material: www.jstage.jst.go.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:www.jstage.jst.go.jp
02Classification of foreshock, aftershock, swarm, and large-earthquake spatiotemporal sequences前震、余震、群震与大震时空序列分类OUT-SL1927-1963-1990-EARTHQUAKE-SEQUENCE-AND-FAULT-HETEROGENEITY
Record year1963
summaryClassification of foreshock, aftershock, swarm, and large-earthquake spatiotemporal sequences. In 1963, it placed aftershocks, foreshocks, and swarms in discussion of a half-space fracture/stress model.
Original Chinese · summary
前震、余震、群震与大震时空序列分类。1963将余震、前震、群震置于半无限体断裂/应力模型讨论。
M rationaleUniversity of Tokyo, J-STAGE, and Tectonophysics abstracts support continuous classification and mechanism work from 1963 to 1990; take M5.8 for phenomenon classification and a fault-heterogeneity hypothesis.
Original Chinese · M rationale
东京大学、J-STAGE与Tectonophysics摘要支持从1963到1990的连续分类和机制工作;按现象分类与断层异质性假说取M5.8。
attribution rationaleMogi 0.43, observation-catalogue team 0.19, prior work 0.20, institution 0.06, peer testing 0.04, unresolved 0.08.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Mogi0.43,观测目录团队0.19,前史0.20,机构0.06,同业检验0.04,未解析0.08。
overlap boundaryA single family of sequence classification: discussion of foreshocks/aftershocks/swarms under a 1963 fracture model, sequential coverage of large-earthquake aftershock zones in 1968, and the 1990 A/B/C sequence–seafloor-topography explanation; it does not duplicate M by paper or type, nor serve as a global short-term prediction rule.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1963断裂模型下的前震/余震/群震讨论、1968大震余震区顺序覆盖及1990 A/B/C序列—海底地形解释的同一序列分类族;不按论文或类型复制M,不作为全球短临预报规则。
Evidence gapsThe full 1963 model, 1968 sample selection, and external validation of the 1990 classification have not been systematically checked.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
1963全文模型、1968样本选择与1990分类外部验证未系统核。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.43Kiyoo MogiOriginal Chinese · 茂木清夫Person
- 0.19Earthquake-catalogue, aftershock-zone, and seismic-network data teamOriginal Chinese · 地震目录、余震区和台网资料团队Team
- 0.2Earlier work in fracture, stress, aftershock, and swarm researchOriginal Chinese · 断裂、应力、余震和群震研究前史Predecessor pool
- 0.06Earthquake Research Institute and journal institutionsOriginal Chinese · 地震研究所与期刊机构Institution
- 0.04Contemporaneous seismological testers and comparative researchersOriginal Chinese · 同期地震学检验与比较研究者Team
- 0.08Unresolved contributions to catalogue compilation, sample selection, and cross-paper workOriginal Chinese · 未解析的目录编制、选样和跨论文贡献Unallocated
Source links
- Public material: repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
- Public material: www.jstage.jst.go.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:www.jstage.jst.go.jp
- Public material: www.sciencedirect.com ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:www.sciencedirect.com
03Analysis of regional variation in earthquake magnitude–frequency parameters地震震级—频度参数的区域差异分析OUT-SL1927-1966-1967-REGIONAL-MAGNITUDE-FREQUENCY-VARIATION
Record year1966
summaryAnalysis of regional variation in earthquake magnitude–frequency parameters. Studies regional variation using the Gutenberg–Richter and Ishimoto–Iida relations as baselines.
Original Chinese · summary
地震震级—频度参数的区域差异分析。以Gutenberg–Richter和Ishimoto–Iida关系为基线研究区域变化。
M rationaleThe beginning of the 1967 original text explicitly studies regional variation using existing laws as a baseline, and the 1966 abstract lists b/m/β comparisons across four regions; take M5.4 for independent statistical diagnosis.
Original Chinese · M rationale
1967原文开头明确以既有定律为基线研究区域变化,1966摘要列出四地区b/m/β比较;按独立统计诊断取M5.4。
attribution rationaleMogi 0.42, network catalogue 0.20, prior work 0.23, institution 0.06, unresolved 0.09.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Mogi0.42,台网目录0.20,前史0.23,机构0.06,未解析0.09。
overlap boundaryComparison of magnitude–frequency, amplitude–frequency, and intensity–frequency parameters across regions in 1966–1967; counts only statistical analysis of regional differences, not the Gutenberg–Richter law or the full value of subsequent b-value monitoring.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1966–1967不同地区震级—频度、振幅—频度与烈度—频度参数比较;只计区域差异的统计分析,不领取Gutenberg–Richter定律或后续b值监测全部价值。
Evidence gapsCatalogue completeness thresholds, statistical uncertainty, and cross-regional comparability need checking.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
需核目录完备阈值、统计不确定度和跨区可比性。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.42Kiyoo MogiOriginal Chinese · 茂木清夫Person
- 0.2Magnitude, amplitude, intensity, and regional-catalogue data teamOriginal Chinese · 震级、振幅、烈度和区域目录数据团队Team
- 0.23Earlier work in frequency laws and parameter definitionsOriginal Chinese · 频度定律和参数定义前史Predecessor pool
- 0.06Earthquake Research Institute and Seismological Society of JapanOriginal Chinese · 地震研究所与日本地震学会Institution
- 0.09Unresolved contributions to data calibration, regional division, and auxiliary analysisOriginal Chinese · 未解析的数据校准、区域划分和辅助分析贡献Unallocated
Source links
- Public material: repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
- Public material: www.jstage.jst.go.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:www.jstage.jst.go.jp
04Tokai long-term risk judgment and critique of the earthquake-prediction system东海长期风险判断与地震预测制度批判OUT-SL1927-1969-2004-TOKAI-RISK-AND-PREDICTION-CRITIQUE
Record year1969
summaryTokai long-term risk judgment and critique of the earthquake-prediction system. Project phases from 1965, accumulated observations, and no successful prediction as of 1993.
Original Chinese · summary
东海长期风险判断与地震预测制度批判。1965起项目期次、观测积累及截至1993无成功预测。
M rationaleA 1995 review explicitly states there were no successful predictions, and a 2004 paper recalls the 1969 proposition and warns against binary forecasts; M5.6 assesses public, falsifiable risk knowledge and critique revealing methodological limits, without incorporating the net effects of monitoring institutions or policy thereby produced.
Original Chinese · M rationale
1995综述明示无成功预测,2004论文回顾1969命题并警告二元预报;M5.6评的是公开、可证伪且揭示方法边界的风险知识与批判,不把由此发生的监测制度或政策净效果纳入。
attribution rationaleMogi 0.31, prediction/monitoring team 0.25, Coordinating Committee 0.11, government institutions 0.10, prior work 0.12, unresolved 0.11.
Original Chinese · attribution rationale
Mogi0.31,预测/监测团队0.25,协调会0.11,政府机构0.10,前史0.12,未解析0.11。
overlap boundaryThe 1969 long-term Tokai regional-risk proposition, the 1995 evidence review that Japan’s prediction program had “no successful cases,” and the 2004 epistemic critique of black-and-white predictions; M counts only reviewable risk analysis and self-limiting texts, not laws, monitoring expenditure, prediction accuracy, or disaster outcomes.
Original Chinese · overlap boundary
1969东海区域长期风险命题、1995对日本预测计划“无成功案例”的证据综述、2004对black-and-white predictions的知识批判;M只计可审查的风险分析与自我限制文本,不计法律、监测支出、预测准确或灾害结果。
Evidence gapsThe original 1969 paper/report and committee meeting records have not been read; long-term calibration of the risk judgment and policy costs lack a systematic counterfactual.
Original Chinese · evidence gaps
1969原始论文/报告和委员会会议记录未读。;风险判断长期校准与政策成本尚无系统反事实。
Full attribution budget
Every recorded actor remains visible. Share (0–1) retains the ledger’s exact decimal value.
- 0.31Kiyoo MogiOriginal Chinese · 茂木清夫Person
- 0.25Japanese earthquake-prediction research and monitoring teamOriginal Chinese · 日本地震预测研究与监测团队Team
- 0.11Japan Earthquake Prediction Coordinating CommitteeOriginal Chinese · 日本地震预知连络会Institution
- 0.1Japanese disaster-prevention and observation institutionsOriginal Chinese · 日本防灾与观测机构Institution
- 0.12Earlier work in plates, historical earthquakes, and long-term risk assessmentOriginal Chinese · 板块、历史地震与长期风险评估前史Predecessor pool
- 0.11Unresolved contributions to the 1969 judgment materials, committee division of labor, and policyOriginal Chinese · 未解析的1969判断资料、委员会分工和政策贡献Unallocated
Source links
- Public material: www.jstage.jst.go.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:www.jstage.jst.go.jp
- Public material: www.jstage.jst.go.jp ↗Original Chinese label · 公开资料:www.jstage.jst.go.jp
BOUNDARIES NOT COUNTED
Not included in this score
These subjects are recorded as exclusions and are not silently treated as zero or as part of the included outcomes.
Unimplemented policies and subsequent attribution
尚未落实的政策与后续归功
Reason Policy implementation, subsequent adoption, and the specific shares of each participant are not individually established in the existing material.
Original Chinese reason
政策实施、后世采用及各参与者的具体份额不在现有材料中逐项确证。
Precise earthquake prediction
精确地震预报
Reason Earthquake-hazard research is not equivalent to precise prediction of a particular earthquake.
Original Chinese reason
地震危险性研究不等同于对特定地震的精准预报。
How to read this score
Scores can change when evidence is reviewed. The method page explains how magnitude, attribution, and included results relate to the displayed score.
Read the method in English →